Search for: "Jackson v. Rule et al" Results 61 - 80 of 324
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2020, 11:36 am by Aimee Guthat
” In the Northern District of California, Immigrant Legal Resource Center et al. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:40 am by Eugene Volokh
On one hand, they restrict private employer choice, and can often undermine private employers' legitimate policy interests, much as other antidiscrimination laws do; I'm generally a supporter of employment-at-will as a legal rule, and am not eager to see further restrictions on that rule. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
For example, in Jackson v Jackson, 2008 CanLii 3222 (ON SC), in the context of a high conflict dispute, Justice Murray held that a good lawyer will “attempt to minimize conflict while achieving appropriate results for their clients informed by the applicable legal principles including, the best interests of the children” (at para 11). [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 4:48 am by Sophia Tang
State immunity in global COVID-19 pandemic: Alters, et. al. v People’s Republic of China, et. al. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 9:48 pm by Sophia Tang
State immunity in global COVID-19 pandemic: Alters, et. al. v People’s Republic of China, et. al. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 6:27 am by David Post
Bolton, Mulvaney, Pompeo, Giuliani, et. al. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:40 am by David Post
[A recently-filed cert petition gives the Court a good opportunity to rule on the constitutional role of presidential electors] A cert petition (available here) has been filed with the Supreme Court in the latest case involving "faithless electors," Chiafalo et al. v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  We had a post on the new rules and Practice Guidance by Aidan Wills. [read post]