Search for: "James v. Scott"
Results 61 - 80
of 915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm
Scott R. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:41 am
O’Brien III, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Thursday, January 19, 2023 Tags: Cryptocurrency, M&A, Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Securities Act, SPACs, Wong v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:41 am
O’Brien III, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Thursday, January 19, 2023 Tags: Cryptocurrency, M&A, Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Securities Act, SPACs, Wong v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Dred Scott is the most obvious example, albeit perhaps too easy—my standard example is instead The Civil RightsCases, which bases a crabbed interpretation of the Thirteenth Amendment on a claim about the public understanding of the relationship between slavery and economic exclusion that is only sustainable under an exclusively white conception of the demos. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
James, an unrelated matter. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Federation and Secession, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 2:50 pm
Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 pm
Representative James P. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 11:42 am
The Supreme Court has, finally, relegated a tragic error to the ash heap of history alongside such similarly unjust and ignominious decisions as Dred Scott v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 1:59 pm
Jurecic sat down with Scott R. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 12:22 pm
Was cited in the following article: Colleen V. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:03 am
Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
The linchpin of Mostyn J’s conclusions in his recent series of judgments is (a) that the correct interpretation of Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 is that financial remedy proceedings which are not concerned with child maintenance are and should always have been heard in public or as if in public, and (b) that, even if this is not right, the 2009 rule change which admitted accredited journalists to hearings of financial remedy proceedings rendered them public hearings. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:27 am
Malzberg v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:57 pm
Stewart Baker sat down with Alan Rozenshtein and Adam Candeub for a deep dive of the NetChoice v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
James Madison had suggested that constitutional protections of rights were, ultimately, only “parchment barriers” against the desires of those with political power, whether democratic majorities or oligarchs, to get their way. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 2:55 pm
Winslow, decided today by Judge James Lorenz (S.D. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
James Welland [2011] Worcester Const. [read post]
