Search for: "Jammie Thomas"
Results 61 - 80
of 877
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2009, 1:16 pm
Thomas's new married name, Jammie Thomas-Rasset.The scheduling order provides that the defendant herself is required to appear at the June 10th hearing. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 7:55 pm
Several developments in the case of Jammie Thomas-Rasset following the third jury's award of $1.5 million to the major record labels in their copyright infringement suit:Thomas-Rasset is seeking to have the award reduced to zero, on constitutional grounds. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 7:28 am
Thomas-Rasset, the defendant has filed a motion for reconsideration requesting the Court to now reach the constitutional due process issue which it had declined to reach in its prior decision setting aside the verdict on the ground of remittitur, but not on the basis of due process.Defendant submitted Judge Gertner's decision in SONY v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 2:19 am
The $1.92 million jury award against Jammie-Thomas Rasset passes constitutional muster, the Department of Justice stated in a brief filed today.DOJ Brief in defense of Thomas-Rasset Award In June, a Minneapolis federal jury found that Thomas-Rasset had used KaZaA to download and "share" 24 songs without permission, and awarded the record label plaintiffs $80,000 per work. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:19 am
Hat tip to Phil Usher and Wired.comThe United States Supreme Court has denied certiorari in Jammie Thomas's case, Capitol Records v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 11:23 pm
A federal judge tentatively has set(.pdf) a March 9 retrial date in the Jammie Thomas music file sharing case. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:17 am
Thomas, Jammie Thomas's motion for an extension of the discovery deadline, in order to enable her to designate Assistant Professor Yongdae Kim of the University of Minnesota as her expert witness, has been granted by Magistrate Judge Raymond L. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 7:42 am
Jammie Thomas-Rasset's lawyers have filed their opposition to the RIAA's motion to prevent defendant from objecting to the plaintiffs' copyright registrations, in Capitol Records v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:42 am
The judge in the Jammie Thomas-Rasset case is considering canceling the third trial in this long-running litigation brought by the major record labels against an individual peer-to-peer user.The parties are preparing for a new trial starting Nov. 2, to focus only on damages, following the court's remittitur of the $1.92 million verdict handed down by a Minneapolis jury in 2009. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 3:18 pm
Wired News reports that the Electronic Frontier Foundation is going to file an amicus curiae brief in support of Jammie Thomas's appeal in Capitol v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:51 am
The major record labels and Jammie Thomas-Rasset don't agree on much, but they have come together in perfect harmony to tell the court: Hell no, we won't settle. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:19 pm
UPDATE: A third jury finds damages of $1.5 million this time against Jammie Thomas-Rasset (who had turned down a offer to settle for $25,000). [11/1/2010 post:] U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 1:09 am
Thomas-Rasset lied under oath. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:34 pm
Photo: Marmadon See Also: Jury in RIAA Trial Slaps $2 Million Fine on Jammie Thomas New Jammie Thomas Lawyers Vow to Put RIAA on Trial Jammie Thomas Lawyer: Get Me Off This Case! [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:13 am
According to this article in p2pnet.net, Kazaa, which is now a business partner of the RIAA/Big 4 record companies, is referring to the Jammie Thomas-Rasset case in its advertising, saying "they" are going to "come at you like they came at tereastarr". [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
The judge in the Jammie Thomas-Rasset case today granted the parties' joint motion for relief from the court's previous order to participate in settlement talks. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 6:14 pm
The record label plaintiffs have opted for a third trial against Jammie Thomas-Rasset rather than accept the court's decision to reduce the jury's award from $1.92 million to $54,000. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 10:21 am
The record label plaintiffs case have filed their brief opposing Jammie Thomas-Rasset 's last-minute attempt to avoid a third trial in the peer-to-peer copyright case. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
The Recording Industry Association of America says the $222,000 a Minnesota federal jury concluded Jammie Thomas should pay for infringing 24 copyrighted music tracks "represents a reasoned award," according to court documents filed late Thursday. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:22 pm
Thomas-Rasset, defendant's motion to extend her time to file her brief to February 6th has been granted.Order extending defendant's time to file brief responding to RIAA's brief var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; [read post]
