Search for: "Jane Doe Edwards" Results 61 - 80 of 132
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2015, 4:35 am by SHG
While Jane Doe #3 has her own lawyers, Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell, more than ready to do her bidding, these two couldn’t bear the Dersh’s “public and aggressive victim-blaming,” and so they felt compelled to call him out. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:27 pm by Sebastian Brady
While the resolution passed yesterday does not block either side from purchasing arms or impose immediate sanctions, it does form a panel that will identify people blocking the peace process and punish them with travel bans and asset freezes. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
While this is a compilation of very readable, eloquent texts, which make the engagement an intellectual pleasure, it does not really add substantial value to the previously presented perspectives and at times lack academic rigor. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 5:48 am by Jeralyn
If not, see my four prior posts on the Dershowitz - Jane Doe claims, accessible here.] [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 2:31 am by INFORRM
The lawyers for “Jane Doe”, who is seeking to intervene in the claim concerning Jeffrey Epstein in the Florida Courts are suing lawyer Alan Dershowitz for libel. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 6:16 am by SHG
Judge Gertner’s response to Tabo offers the first glimmer of reconciliation, that Cassell might have been “inadvertently” sucked down the rabbit hole by Jane Doe #3. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 6:59 am by Jeralyn
I thought I was done with this topic for a few days but there's news: Lawyers for Jane Doe #3 (aka Virginia Roberts), Paul Cassell (pictured above right) and Bradley Edwards (not pictured) have sued Alan Dershowitz for defamation per se in state... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 3:49 pm by Tom Smith
"Referring to one of his clients by the name used for her in court documents, Cassell added, "Jane Doe #3, however, has been viciously attacked by Mr. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:14 am by SHG
Epstein required Jane Doe #3 to describe the events that she had with these men so that he could potentially blackmail them. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:52 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
” This is supposedly being done on “behalf of the American people” (“John and Jane Does 1-10″ listed in the “Plaintiffs” field). [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 12:19 pm by Benjamin Bissell
Yesterday, Jane told us that American airstrikes and Iraqi forces had broken the siege of Amerli. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:59 am by Ritika Singh
Remember that guy Edward Snowden? [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 6:21 am by Tara Hofbauer
Ritika linked to the event’s webcast: NBC released data from its latest poll on Edward Snowden. [read post]
Not only does it mean that many executive branch activities are hidden from most lawmakers, but even when a lawmaker is "read in" to a secret program, that disclosure serves more to handcuff and neuter the lawmaker than it does to empower them to fight questionable activities. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 6:41 am
On July 7, 2008, Edwards and I filed a petition alleging that Jane Doe No. 1 was a victim of federal sex crimes committed by Epstein and that the United States had wrongfully excluded her from plea negotiations. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 8:28 am by Yishai Schwartz
Ben reviewed The Snowden Operation: Inside the West’s Greatest Intelligence Disaster, a new extended essay by Edward Lucas. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:38 am by admin
  The list does not include law firms, but does include lawyers who work for law firms. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:38 am by admin
  The list does not include law firms, but does include lawyers who work for law firms. [read post]