Search for: "Jay Willis"
Results 61 - 80
of 185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2015, 1:14 pm
Jay M. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 2:44 pm
And at Balls and Strikes, Jay Willis has a post titled “Will Someone Please Share Kyle Duncan’s Thoughts on ‘Fairness’ With the Supreme Court; The conservative justices spent a lot of time last month worrying about whether Biden’s student debt relief plan is ‘fair’; Kyle Duncan has some notes for them. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 10:35 am
” Editor-in-Chief Jay Willis has posts titled “Welcome to Balls & Strikes: Who we are, what we’re doing, and how you can be a part of it” and “Legal Journalism Is Broken; The conservative takeover of the Court is putting traditional legal media to the test; The results are not encouraging. [read post]
7 May 2018, 6:25 am
After sitting on a panel, we recruited two guest hosts for this episode: Roman Martinez of Latham & Watkins, and Willy Jay of Goodwin Procter. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 7:25 am
The debt, which was figured to be $16.7 million together with interest and penalty, was negotiated to a mere $6 million by Nelson’s lawyer, Jay Goldberg. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:14 pm
Jay M. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 11:50 am
“Big Law’s Cancel Culture, and Other Obviously Fake Things That Do Not Exist; Recasting America’s richest law firms as victims of woke culture obscures the real-world impact of the work these firms do all day, every day, six minutes at a time”: Jay Willis has this post at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:04 pm
“Supreme Court Justices Must Either Explain Themselves Or Shut Up About ‘Unfair Treatment’; People who cannot be bothered to explain their votes in high-stakes, life-or-death cases are not entitled to the benefit of the doubt”: Jay Willis has this essay online at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 7:24 pm
And in commentary, online at Slate, Jay Willis has a Jurisprudence essay titled “SCOTUS Considers How Easy It Should Be for Police to Steal People’s Property; This case could have life-changing consequences for people caught up in the legal system who haven’t actually been convicted, or even accused, of a crime. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:32 am
” Jay Willis has this essay online at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:40 pm
“The Case For Sonia Sotomayor’s Retirement Is Not Just About Sonia Sotomayor; Democrats must reconceptualize what it means to serve responsibly on the Supreme Court, where a handful of unexpected vacancies can flip the balance of power for generations”: Jay Willis has this essay online at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 10:25 am
United States is the last, best chance to hold the ex-president accountable for trying to steal the last election before the next one takes place; The Republican justices understand that their job is to talk about anything else”: Jay Willis has this essay online at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
2 May 2024, 5:27 pm
” Jay Willis has this post at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
23 May 2024, 6:14 pm
And online at Balls and Strikes, Jay Willis has an essay titled “How Many Coup-Adjacent Flags Can One Supreme Court Justice Possibly Have: If there is a flagpole on the premises, this man is apparently powerless to stop himself from displaying the preferred symbols of violent insurrectionists. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:10 pm
By Jay Calhoun, Jason Brown, Angela Adolph, Phyllis Sims, Willie Kolarik, and Jason Seo Effective July 1, 2018, House Bill (“HB”) 10 of the 2018 Third Extraordinary Session of the Louisiana Legislature has amended La. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 7:16 pm
English: Willie Nelson getting ready to perform. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 3:30 am
Anastasia’s grandfather, Willie Bingham, said that the family would press charges whether the owner is a relative or not. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 11:57 am
Jay Shepherd wouldn’t listen to Willie Nelson. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 12:19 pm
(Willis, Willis, Wheless, Wheless, and Wilson). [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 11:53 am
Liberals Were Right to Fear the Supreme Court’s Election Intervention By Jay Willis, Lawyer and Senior Contributor, The Appeal Jay Willis argues that, despite the fact that courts did not overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election as Donald Trump had hoped, there is still great cause for worry about their actions and that they may very well have ruled for him had the results been closer. [read post]
