Search for: "John B. O" Results 61 - 80 of 1,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2023, 5:01 am by jonathanturley
The latest was State University of New York (SUNY) system Chancellor John B. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Moritz, decided Mar. 31 by the Nebraska Supreme Court (in an opinion by Justice John Freudenberg, joined by Chief Justice Michael Heavican and Justices Stephanie Stacy and Jonathan Papik): At issue in this appeal is whether social media posts directed toward local public figures from a public account of an officer of a local bank constituted misconduct in connection with work disqualifying the employee from unemployment benefits. [read post]
30 May 2023, 2:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
§ 100(b) is defined to include “a new use of a known process. [read post]
30 May 2023, 2:30 am by Jack Sharman
Take a break from whatever you are reading — presidential indictment, sports tweet, or adversary’s brief. [read post]
21 May 2023, 12:43 pm by Jack Bogdanski
It declares that (a) Portland is just fine, and (b) if it isn't, it's all the fault of the rich people and the cops. [read post]
17 May 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
In the principal judgment, having first considered Re St John the Baptist, Penshurst [2015] (Court of Arches) and following the guidance in Re St. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Introduction There are many different theories of constitutional interpretation, but the most controversial and also perhaps the most influential is "originalism. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm by Josh Blackman
O'Connor basically wrote what would become the Rehnquist concurrence, but later O'Connor ultimately joined Kennedy's more moderate opinion based on the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:50 am by David
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) requires that fraud or mistake be pled with particularity. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am by admin
Back in 2011, at a Fourth Circuit Judicial Conference, Chief Justice John Roberts took a cheap shot at law professors and law reviews when he intoned: “Pick up a copy of any law review that you see, and the first article is likely to be, you know, the influence of Immanuel Kant on evidentiary approaches in 18th Century Bulgaria, or something, which I’m sure was of great interest to the academic that wrote it, but isn’t of much help to the bar. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 12:51 am by Frank Cranmer
Both the High Court and the Court of Appeal found for Mrs B. [read post]