Search for: "John Doe B" Results 61 - 80 of 5,817
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm by Guest Author
Circuit largely disagreed with the district court about the statute, finding that the agency’s reading satisfied Chevron.[8] On one point, though, the court of appeals found that the Federal Reserve had inadequately explained its decision to limit its regulation.[9] Like Judge Leon, the appellate judges realized that eliminating the legal effect of the rule while the agency conducted further proceedings would harm the plaintiffs, who had prevailed on that point.[10] The… [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
., Churching NIMBYs: Creating Affordable Housing on Church Property, (Yale Law Journal, Vol. 133, No. 4, 2024).Nelson Tebbe, Does Dobbs Reinforce Democracy? [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
On March 6, 2024, John Doe filed his opposition to Maine Trust's motion to intervene…. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 2:29 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
But the second part of the DOJ’s gloss on their allegation does make one wonder. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm by Josh Blackman
In October 2021, Justice Barrett wrote her influential concurrence in John Does 1-3 v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:16 pm by Alexis Hancock
The decrypted data could possibly look like this JSON blob:          {"family_name":"Doe",          "given_name":"John",          "birth_date":"1980-10-10",         … [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 3:51 am
Nor does Opposer cite any other evidence in the trial record to substantiate its Section 1(b) claim. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
Moreover, the term “shall” at the beginning of the first sentence reflects that the obligation is binding on Canada and does not give space for discretionary application of the rule. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 5:59 am by Silas Lee
The author would like to thank John Pritchard and Masuud Issa for their significant contribution to this article. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
The court held that Section 3 did notapply because the Presidency, which Section 3 does notmention by name, is not an “office . . . under the United3Cite as: 601 U. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
Last Friday, John Jenkins wrote about another momentous ruling by Chancellor Kathaleen St. [read post]