Search for: "John Radice" Results 61 - 80 of 2,711
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2020, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
William Lloyd Garrison, circa 1870 As the Library of Congress points out: The radical tone of the paper was unprecedented because it labeled slave-holding a crime and called for immediate abolition. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Politico Magazine (via How Appealing), Jeff Greenfield writes that the late Justice John Paul Stevens’ 2014 book “Six Amendments” revealed Stevens “as a deep pessimist about what has happened to the high court as an instrument for expanding justice, a man who believed that the radical shift in the Court’s direction required radical remedies. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 3:13 pm
The New York Times of Saturday, April 7, 2007, has a piece on the op-ed page by John Marchese, author of the newly appearing The Violin Maker: Finding a Centuries Old Tradition in a Brooklyn Workshop, all about comparing Strads to modern violins. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
There a former professor of the Institute John White delivered a diatribe against the national curriculum, arguing it to be in urgent need of radical overhaul, if not wholesale replacement. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:48 pm by The 463: Inside Tech Policy
  Challenging Keynes, the economist who helped us understand the cause and solutions to the Great Depression, is a pretty radical move. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 7:05 am
As the radical right now begins to fill John McCain's campaign coffers with fools' gold in exchange for his VP pick, put your money where your heart is: with freedom. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:26 am
Which reminds me, as Glenn Greenwald noted, John Yoo believes that the Congress can end the Iraq Debacle by not funding it: Even John Yoo -- the most radical worshipper of limitless executive power and one of the architects of the administration's radical theories of lawlessness -- said in a February Op-Ed in The New York Times: The fact is, Congress has every power to end the war -- if it really wanted to. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 11:35 am
JOHN LEO REGARDS LEE BOLLINGER'S RECENT TALK about free speech at Columbia as hypocritical: Last October, Columbia radicals stormed a campus stage, knocking over furniture, creating pandemonium and preventing speeches by Minutemen leader Jim Gilchrist and a colleague. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The United States would be a radically different place had it not been for “the great,the good, the wise” John Marshall, as he was described by another famous and well-respected Supreme Court Justice, Joseph Story. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:26 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Edwards's lawyers have argued that the case is unprecedented and is based on a radical interpretation of campaign finance law that the former senator could not have foreseen. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:26 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Edwards's lawyers have argued that the case is unprecedented and is based on a radical interpretation of campaign finance law that the former senator could not have foreseen. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 12:01 am
  Also see this review by John Fund in the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 4:06 am
Loser tonight: Karl Rove, the radical right and Republicans. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 11:00 am by Paul Caron
Adrianna Kezar (USC), Tom DePaola (USC) & Daniel Scott (USC), The Gig Academy: Mapping Labor in the Neoliberal University (Johns Hopkins University Press 2019): Over the past two decades, higher education employment has undergone a radical transformation with faculty becoming contingent, staff being outsourced, and postdocs and graduate students becoming... [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 12:25 pm
Merrill Lynch’s John Thain and Lehman Brothers‘ Richard Fuld Jr. made different strategic decisions over the last year that shaped radically diverse outcomes for their employees and shareholders. [read post]
17 Aug 2005, 7:00 am
[JURIST] US Senator Patrick Leahy [official website] (D-VT), ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, denounced [press release] Tuesday the "radical" views of US Supreme Court nominee John Roberts [JURIST news archive] and claimed that Roberts worked to reverse "decades of policies on civil rights, voting rights, women's rights, privacy, and access to justice. [read post]