Search for: "John Robson"
Results 61 - 80
of 126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am
” Ruthann Robson looks at the cases for the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:51 am
Ruthann Robson recaps the argument at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Amy Howe reports for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court, that remarks during yesterday’s argument by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer at a “rally outside the court prompted a sharp rebuke from Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am
” Ruthann Robson discusses the argument at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am
New York during his filibuster yesterday of John Brennan’s nomination as CIA Director. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
” Commentary on the case comes from John Culhane at Politico Magazine, Roger Pilon in an op-ed for The Orange County Register, and Brian Miller in an op-ed for Forbes. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:10 pm
John, Assumption and Plaquemines Parishes. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
” Commentary comes from Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
10 May 2010, 6:11 am
Louis: Miriam Cherry (McGeorge) (2010-11)Stanford: John Donohue (Yale) (2010-11); Nita Farahany (Vanderbilt) (Spring 2011); Mark McKenna (Notre Dame) (Fall 2010); Bernadette Meyler (Cornell) (Spring 2011)Texas: Aaron Bruhl (Houston) (Fall 2010); Adam Rosenzweig (Washington Univ.) (2010-11)UC-Berkeley: Russell Robinson (UCLA) (2010-11)UC-Irvine: Richard Hasen (Loyola LA) (Spring 2011)UCLA: Youngjae Lee (Fordham) (Spring 2011); Vicki… [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:52 pm
Ruthann Robson, a professor of constitutional law at the City University of New York, said the bans could eventually be taken up by the Supreme Court if the justices decide there's a constitutional question. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:02 am
Louis: Miriam Cherry (McGeorge) (2010-11)Stanford: Nita Farahany (Vanderbilt) (Spring 2011); Mark McKenna (Notre Dame) (Fall 2010); Bernadette Meyler (Cornell) (Spring 2011); Nicholas Rosenkranz (Georgetown) (Fall 2010)**Texas: Aaron Bruhl (Houston) (Fall 2010); Adam Rosenzweig (Washington Univ.) (2010-11)UC-Berkeley: Russell Robinson (UCLA) (2010-11)UC-Irvine: Richard Hasen (Loyola LA) (Spring 2011)UCLA: Youngjae Lee (Fordham) (Spring… [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:35 am
” Other reports and commentary on the case come from Michael Doyle at McClatchy, Ilya Shapiro at Cato at Liberty, Damon Root at Reason.com, Jaclyn Belczyk at JURIST, Jeremy Jacobs at Greenwire, and Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am
Commentary comes from Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
” [Disclosure: John Elwood, a frequent contributor to this blog, is among the counsel to Anthony Elonis. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am
At the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson discusses a recent decision by the Tenth Circuit upholding the constitutionality of the Stolen Valor Act – the question presented in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
At the Maryland Appellate Blog, Steve Klepper suggests “three reasons” why Chief Justice John Roberts “might vote with the majority and assign the opinion to himself” in the challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
Briefly: At this blog, John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted and held cases; Amanda Frost provides an “Academic highlight. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
John Fund, Greg Stohr of Bloomberg observes that, “a quarter-century after the U.S. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 9:18 am
Ontario construction law boutique Robson Carpenter is looking for a litigation lawyer to join their team. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 12:26 pm
And be sure to read John Robson's hilarious, "Self-Censorship? [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:40 am
Briefly: In an op-ed at The Hill, Lawrence Friedman suggests that “[a] closer look at those recent decisions of [Chief Justice John] Roberts that have disappointed conservatives reveals that none is likely to be the last word on the subject. [read post]
