Search for: "Johnson v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC." Results 61 - 80 of 129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2016, 7:57 am by Clay Hodges
(Texas District Court, Dallas) Product:  Gynecare Prosima Pelvic Floor Repair System Key Product Defendants:  Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 6:47 am by Joy Waltemath
Judge Manion, dissenting in part, agreed with the lower court that the “things each plaintiff heard were too isolated, indirect, and sporadic to be actionable” (Johnson v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:41 am by Jonathan Koenig
As a direct result of Siegel and Norfleet, sentencing procedure has already changed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:45 pm
Johnson, 846 F.2d 279, 283-84 (5th Cir. 1988), and United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Trump himself made this Positions Clause argument before the Colorado Supreme Court, and he even prevailed on it in the Colorado district court. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 2:35 pm
This post examines an opinion from the Appellate Court ofIllinois – Second District:  People v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 8:45 am by Ron Coleman
  In fact, the Circuit Court found that in this regard the District Court had erred by improperly shifting the burden on summary judgment to Universal. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:25 am
  And SCOTUSBlog has some interesting stuff on whether the 2nd Amendment, as interpreted by the Court last year in District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 10:37 am by Sai Vinod
The US District Court for the Nothern District of California in [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 6:21 am
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit:  U.S. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
(And, as always, I would really appreciate being updated when you have good things happen in district court--good verdict, good motion, etc. so that I can pass it along to other defenders through this blog).Just a quick observation--it seems a little odd to me that the state so infrequently petitions the KSC for review of their COA losses in interlocutory appeals (only 1 in 14). [read post]