Search for: "Johnson v. Department of Commerce" Results 61 - 80 of 160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by Colby Pastre
Hewitt, 329 U.S. 249, 252-53 (1946)) or “No State has the right to lay a tax on interstate commerce in any form” (Leloup v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
Diaz, No. 08-1575 A sentence pursuant to a guilty plea to knowingly possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute is affirmed where, because the decision to depart by levels is discretionary, the district court's decision to select the higher of two levels that encompassed the mandatory minimum sentence was procedural error.. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
Kent (Southern District of Texas) was impeached for sexually assaulting his female legal aides and then lying about it to the FBI and the Justice Department. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
” At Balkinization, Marty Lederman explains why one of the court’s newest cases for OT 2018, In re Department of Commerce, et al., a dispute arising out of a challenge to the administration’s decision to add a question about citizenship to the 2020 census, is “a very strange, almost inexplicable, grant. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am by Erin Miller
Petitioner’s reply Title: Johnson Controls v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:24 am by David DePaolo
So if a doctor said it was necessary then it was...Now, the First District Court of Appeals for California has agreed to hear a constitutional challenge to the IMR process.A date and time for the oral argument in Stevens v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
Challengers regularly argue that such laws violate so-called dormant commerce clause principles by discriminating against (or seeking to alter) disfavored out-of-state production methods. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:51 pm
Citing the Supreme Court’s 1985 precedent of Heckler v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am by Andrew Hamm
Marshall, of course, would become the paradigm-shifting fourth Chief Justice and author of the decision in Marbury v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am by John Elwood
The court denied the Justice Department’s petition for certiorari before judgment in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 10:45 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Standard works (Kennedy's CIF Contracts) and decisions [Johnson v Taylor Bros (1920) AC 144, 155] recognise the following as features of CIF contractsCIF contracts relate to carriage of goods by sea. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included:   Senators Specter and Leahy express concern about ACTA Treaty (Techdirt) (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP Justice) (Michael Geist) (Public Knowledge) (Intellectual Property Watch) Commerce Department cites questionable stats, Chamber of Commerce uses them to ask Bush to sign PRO IP Bill into law (Techdirt)… [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]