Search for: "Johnson v. Holland" Results 61 - 80 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm by Tom Goldstein
Quon Docket: 08-1332 Argument date: Will be set for argument in March or April 2010 Question presented: Does the Constitution prevent the government from reviewing text messages sent by an employee on a government device. ------- Criminal Law ------- Title: Johnson v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
”  [via LexisOne] Week of May 16,  2010: In Favor of the Prosecution or Warden  (initial list) Donnie Johnson v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
Consider: the same lawyers who parse every word of the great statements by Abraham Lincoln and John Bingham during the First Reconstruction completely ignore comparable speeches by Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey during the Second Reconstruction. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am by Kelly
Phoenix Fence Company (Docket Report) District Court E D Pennsylvania: False marking intent to deceive cannot be inferred from knowledge of the limited duration of patents and expiration of marked patents: Hollander v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-282, asking whether conspiracy to commit robbery is a violent felony justifying an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act, appears to be a hold for Johnson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
The address for service mess for UK trade marksTradeix Ltd v New Holland Ventures (MARCO POLO) O/681/22 UKIPO (August 2022)The UKIPO has a generous policy for who it allows to act as representatives in UK trade mark matters. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Johnson , No. 07-10 In a proceeding seeking post-conviction relief for conviction of capital murder and robbery, denial of petitioner's writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims of ineffective assistance of counsel based on a failure to seek public funds for a DNA expert, as well as a failure to investigate and present mitigating evidence. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]