Search for: "Johnson v. Mark" Results 61 - 80 of 1,375
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
” IPSO 10284-22 Hodgson v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 14301-22 Clews v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 00740-23 A woman v Birminghammail.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation 09808-23 Boyle v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 12490-22 Portes v The… [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
In political, scientific, and artistic history, consider any biography or history describing Cleopatra, Mark Antony, Hannibal, Vincent van Gogh, Alan Turing, Ernest Hemingway, Ma­ri­lyn Monroe, or Kurt Cobain. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
Perhaps we have reached the stage of dealing with scientific evidence at which errant and aberrant cases should be retracted, and clearly marked as retracted in the official reporters, and in the electronic legal databases. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
Johnson J held that the comments were defamatory in a preliminary trial of the claim on 25 July 2022. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm by Joel R. Brandes
  In Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v Bafna-Louis, 2023 WL 2387385 (S.D.N.Y., 2023) the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (the “RBKC”) brought a petition for the return of CBL and Baby L to the United Kingdom pursuant to the Hague Convention. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
Critics, including Boris Johnson, say the image drew on anti-Semitic tropes and was “explicitly racist”. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:57 pm by bndmorris
Brandon Beck, Judge Higginson and the Role of the Solicitor General in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
On the same day, the High Court granted business coach and anti-bullying campaigner, Lisa Johnson, the maximum award of £25,000 in damages for a Facebook post published by the defendant, containing defamatory and untrue allegations that Mrs Johnson was a bully and fraud. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:41 am by Michael Caruso
”But people accused in federal court obtained the right to counsel twenty-five years earlier in Johnson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 2:56 pm by Holman
Johnson & Son, Inc., (1990), the court held that the fact that the validity of a patent claim has previously been upheld in an earlier litigation is not to be given  stare decisis effect, citing Stevenson v. [read post]