Search for: "Johnson v. Parker" Results 61 - 80 of 135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Thus, "banning from the home the most preferred firearm in the nation to keep' and use for protection of one's home and family, ' [Parker v District of Columbia,] 478 F3d [370] at 400 [DC Cir 2007], would fail constitutional muster. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Available on line is a symposium on New York Times v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Google also submitted that the Judge was bound by a decision of Kenneth Parker J in R( British Telecommunications) v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 7:56 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Daniel Parker, No. 111,044 (Riley)Direct appeal; First-degree murderLydia Krebs (brief); Peter Maharry (argue)Improper closing argumentState v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
The 1773 edition of Samuel Johnson’s dictionary defined “arms” as “weapons of offence, or armour of defence. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The district court threw out the case, but the Court of Appeals reinstates it because plaintiff engaged in protected activity under the First Amendment.The case is Johnson v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm by John Elwood
Dukes involving the standard for class-action certification, and a fourth time in Parker v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm by John Elwood
Johnson, 11-1053, a state-on-top habeas case out of the Third Circuit; Parker, Warden v. [read post]