Search for: "Johnson v. Price et al" Results 61 - 80 of 100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Susan Schneider
 Pesticide overspray drift to a neighboring property in Minnesota may now qualify as a trespass, thanks to the Minnesota Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Johnson, et al., v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 9:30 am by J. Gordon Hylton
On May 22, Walter Joseph Kowalski of Red Hook, New York passed away at age 88. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In discussing how companies are using delaying tactics to stall hostile takeover bids (a subject for another day), Steven Davidoff opines: The trick is for courts to prevent this manipulation from depriving shareholders of the ultimate choice of when to sell the company. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
"Healing ourselves is the essence of democratic development. [read post]
Nov. 20, 2009) (O'Neill)(A&M bonfire litigation aftermath, proportionate responsibility, responsible third party) (petition for review mooted by settlement and status change to "settling person") ZACHRY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, ET AL. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:36 pm
In general, milk-related outbreaks due to E. coli O157:H7 are uncommon, but almost always associated with raw milk products when they occur (Rangel et al, 2005; Hussein et al, 2005). [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter… [read post]
29 May 2009, 4:00 am
Harris Associates(.pdf) Petitioner's reply in Jones, et al., v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure… [read post]