Search for: "Johnson-Harris v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2007, 10:13 am
[ILB note: Harris v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:18 pm
WALGREEN COMPANY; from Harris County; 14th district (14-06-00962-CV, 243 SW3d 183, 10-11-07)[Dissenting opinion in 14-06-00962-CV]08-0212 THE ESTATE OF STEPHEN ELLIS ALEXANDER; from McLennan County; 10th district (10-06-00360-CV, 250 SW3d 461, 01-30-08)08-0242 UNITED PLAZA-MIDLAND L.L.C. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm
United States, 17-6877 Issue: Whether, following Johnson v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
United States in Kermit L. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 7:41 am
" In his post on the Volokh Conspiracy, Ilya Somin discusses the possible reasons why the Solicitor General, in her petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:28 am
However, in Harris v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Johnson; (2) whether a conviction aided by the prosecution's failure to produce evidence that contradicted its theory and showed that the evidence it did rely upon and the resulting jury arguments were false violates the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under this Court's Brady v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:27 am
United States [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 9:28 am
Harris issued a Published Opinion, No. 12-401, relevant to a law enforcement agency’s dual responsibilities to comply with Brady v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. et al, case number 2:18-cv-01435, filed in the United States District Court Central District of California, claimed the two works were "in many ways identical". [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 11:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
One judge, Harry E. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:14 am
Todd v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:11 am
” At National Review’s Bench Memos, Robert Alto has a two-part series responding to Justice Elena Kagan’s dissent in Harris v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
May 2, 2005); Johnson v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:12 am
Harris, 19-466Issues: (1) Whether in Scott v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:46 am
Harris v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 11:49 am
Then there was State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:15 am
United States that “the President has the exclusive authority to remove executive branch officials. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
