Search for: "Johnston v. Long"
Results 61 - 80
of 186
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2017, 6:41 am
Chief Judge Smith dissented (NLRB v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
The first is Johnston Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
In any event, HC’s averments of reasonable diligence (ie section 11(3) of the 1973 Act) and of error induced by the solicitors (ie section 6(4), with the proviso of “reasonable diligence”) are, in my opinion, sufficient to entitle HC to a proof before answer in each case, all pleas standing: see paragraph [62] et seq below. 20‑year long negative prescription: section 7 [6] As I have reached the view… [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
Wilson v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
It will look back to several important recent Supreme Court decisions, in particular Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am
The application which came before me, on 22 July 2016 not long before 1700 hours in chambers, was for interim suspension of the warrant. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 12:07 pm
[United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 9:00 am
Qui Tam “The Bayrock Qui Tam Litigation Partnership,” Plaintiff, v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm
The Independent is to be a digital-only product, whilst the i has been sold to regional publisher Johnston Press for £24 million. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 7:00 pm
In Lin v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 4:27 pm
Long after it has been established in the UK that applications for interim injunctions in IP infringement actions are supposed to focus on the balance of (in)convenience between the parties, Epoch v Character Options was an attempt to resurrect the old practice of looking at the merits of the parties'respective claims: here's a PatLit report by Jeremy. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 5:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:28 am
Johnston v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 3:46 am
Scarcely less sad is the scrap over the annotated statute laws of the State of Georgia, recorded by Andy Johnstone on the same weblog. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
In Carter v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
Johnston v City of Westminster [2015] EWCA Civ 554 A curious case on the effect of a s.198 Housing Act 1996 referral of a homeless applicant to another Authority. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
On the same weblog, Andy Johnstone reviews the latest developments in another long-term saga, the US debate over orphan copyright works. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:18 am
Has Richard Prince been re-purposed, asks Andy Johnstone on the 1709 Blog, reviewing Selena Mooney's attempt to play the appropriation artist at his own game. [read post]
18 May 2015, 10:09 am
The Neighbors are back on Art & Artifice, thanks to a post by Rosie Burbidge with an assist from Molly Stech on this controversial privacy v creativity issue. [read post]
