Search for: "Jonathan Mann"
Results 61 - 80
of 199
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
Co-blogger Jonathan Adler enumerates other controversies about the book’s accuracy here. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
Ronald Mann has this blog’s opinion analysis. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Ronald Mann analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am
There was a Statement in Open Court [pdf] on 26 May 2017 before Mann J. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:03 pm
The judgment is available on Lawtel [£] On 26 May 2017 Mann J handed down judgment in the case of Sir Cliff Richard OBE v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 3:45 am
Ronald Mann has this blog’s opinion analysis. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 6:55 am
Jonathan Coad is a consultant solicitor at Keystone Law. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:30 pm
Mann. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 10:40 am
Scientist and author Michael Mann. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 1:25 pm
Supreme Court,” by Ronald Mann, who is also a contributor to this blog. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 5:55 am
Jonathan Bailey takes a deep dive into the bill, which would set up a voluntary copyright claims process as an easier and less costly alternative to federal litigation. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
Thus it is far more descriptive and less normative than the Dorn-Manne collection. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 6:05 am
Mann thinks they were also defamatory, so he sued. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 4:20 pm
The settlements were announced in statements in open court read before Mann J on 18 November 2016. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
Cendant Mortgage Corporation, which asks whether Fannie Mae’s charter confers federal jurisdiction over cases in which Fannie Mae is a party, and which Ronald Mann previewed for this blog. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am
Ronald Mann has this blog’s analysis of the argument in State Farm; additional coverage comes from Marcia Coyle at The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required). [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 11:45 am
…but it’s also fun: The Hillary Shimmy Song: by Jonathan Mann. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 12:55 pm
, contact jonathan@upsolve.org. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:55 pm
Jonathan Masur has persuasively argued that “any defendant who challenges a strong and worthwhile patent by infringing, and loses at trial, should be made to pay for having created a risk that the patent will be mistakenly invalidated. [read post]
31 May 2016, 12:32 pm
(The appeal in Mann’s suit is still pending in a D.C. court after 18 months.) [read post]
