Search for: "Jones v. English"
Results 61 - 80
of 393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Briggs, Lord Sales, and Lord Hamblen. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 8:08 am
Jones v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 9:44 am
But despite the landmark Somerset v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am
On 14 September, Thawley J refused that application: Australian Information Commissioner v Facebook Inc (No 2) [2020] FCA 1307. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:07 pm
See Miller v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm
In this article, we look at the relevant Court procedures and the data breach class actions making their way through the English courts. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 6:58 am
In the case called Trump v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 8:25 pm
Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
23 May 2020, 3:35 pm
Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
23 May 2020, 3:35 pm
Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am
This is a live blog of the appeal brought by Mastercard concerning class certification under the UK’s collective action regime introduced by the Consumer Rights Act 2015. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm
Invalidity Bones and the Cancellation of the Crystal SkullSkullduggery Rum Ltd v Globefill Incorporated [2020] ETMR 9 EUIPO Cancellation Division (October 2019)Ignore my misleading title – this is nothing to do with Indiana Jones and, in a rare positive decision for a non-traditional mark, did not lead to the cancellation of Globefill’s EUTM for the 3D shape illustrated below. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 2:28 am
Lord Lloyd Jones and Lord Sales gave the judgment, with which all members of the Court agreed. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 8:05 pm
Jones v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 9:56 am
” Cites to Jones v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
” In Brown, and then emphatically in Loving v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:52 am
The first was Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] QB 946, [2005] EWCA Civ 75 (03 February 2005) … The Court of Appeal held that it was an abuse of process for the action before them to proceed “where so little is now seen to be at stake”, and duly struck it out. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm
This include a “serious harm” threshold, a prohibition on public authorities bringing proceedings and a number of provisions which appear to mirror the English Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:58 am
” Francis v. [read post]
