Search for: "Jones v. Lopez" Results 61 - 80 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am by Seán Binder
Republicans on Thursday voted to kick out Jones and fellow Democrat Justin Pearson. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 12:21 pm by CJLF Staff
District Judge Cormac Carney concluded in the case of Jones v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 6 and 7 November 2019 the Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) heard the appeal in the case of W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am by Maureen Johnston
Latsis thirty-percent rule—that, ordinarily, a qualifying “seaman” under the Jones Act must spend thirty percent or more of his time in service of a vessel in navigation—a court may consider the time a [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am by Ruthann Robson - Guest
Lopez),  the Necessary and Proper Clause (United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The producers of Hustlers are asking a New York federal judge to toss a lawsuit filed by the real-life adult entertainer who inspired Jennifer Lopez’s character in the film, arguing she can’t succeed on her claims that the film used her likeness without permission and damaged her reputation. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am by John Elwood
Riley, 14-1472, and Jones v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
If that seems as familiar as Indiana Jones 4, that very question is already before the court in a number of serial relists: Allen v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
Nonetheless, Judge Jones, in his published decision, clearly rejected all the plaintiffs’ witnesses and affiants, including Egilman, in their efforts to make a case for silicone as a cause of autoimmune disease. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 10382-22 Mitchell v The Sentinel, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication Satisfactory Remedy – 10512-22 Bavister v cornwalllive.com, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 01732-22 Rahman v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), No breach – after investigation 00627-22 Doe v You (The Mail on Sunday), 2 Privacy (2021), No breach –… [read post]