Search for: "Jose Padilla" Results 61 - 80 of 693
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2012, 7:50 am by Wells Bennett
Rumsfeld, in which the Fourth Circuit had rejected a Bivens action by Jose Padilla. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:16 am by Russ Bensing
Bush had Jose Padilla, an American citizen, arrested in a Chicago airport and held for years without trial in military custody. [read post]
11 May 2012, 1:37 pm by Steve Vladeck
Rumsfeld, which repeatedly argued for the need for judicial restraint in national security cases (there, as justification for not recognizing a Bivens remedy arising out of Jose Padilla’s allegedly unlawful detention and treatment)… That’s why I found his opinion dissenting from today’s en banc Fourth Circuit decision in al-Shimari v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:14 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Georgetown Law Professor David Cole has this lengthy opinion piece over at Al Jazeera about Jose Padilla. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:12 am by Benjamin Wittes
The other day, David Rivkin and Cully Stimson had this oped in the Washington Post on the recently-passed Virginia law that seeks to prohibit state cooperation with detentions of American citizens under the NDAA. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:27 am by Ted Frank
John Yoo wins in the Ninth Circuit against Jose Padilla, no thanks to the Obama administration. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:40 am by Lovechilde
DonkeyHotey Jose Padilla, an American citizen, was arrested in 2002, at Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport on suspicion of plotting to detonate a dirty bomb. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:10 am by Raffaela Wakeman
This morning’s New York Times Editorial focuses on the treatment of Jose Padilla, whose lawsuit against John Yoo this week was rejected by the 9th Circuit. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:02 am by AstuteLegalVideos.com
 NYTimes.com May 3, 2012 ....Regarding Jose Padilla's lawsuit against John Yoo, the draftsman of policies, which resulted in the torture of Jose Padilla, and the 9th Cir. affirming of qualified immunity...... [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:31 pm by Dawinder "Dave" S. Sidhu
  As noted by others, yesterday a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit ruled against Jose Padilla, a U.S. citizen and “enemy combatant,” who alleged that he was subjected to unlawful detention and abusive interrogation that were both justified by OLC legal memoranda prepared in 2001-2003 by John Yoo. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:51 am by Jerry Votava
The lawsuit, brought by convicted terrorist Jose Padilla [JURIST news archive], claimed Yoo's legal opinions endorsing enhanced interrogation techniques led to Padilla being tortured. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:00 am by Jessica Dorsey
The Ninth Circuit granted qualified immunity to John Yoo in the civil suit by Jose Padilla. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:33 am by Todd Ruger
 Jose Padilla accused Yoo of authorizing harsh treatment of enemy combatants, but the court said the former deputy assistant attorney general wrote the memos in the two years after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, when the law defining torture and the treatment of enemy combatants was unsettled. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:03 am
May 2, 2012): After the September 11, 2011 attacks on the United States, the government detained Jose Padilla, an American citizen, as an enemy combatant. [read post]
2 May 2012, 10:33 pm by Jonathan Hafetz
Yoo, ordering that former “enemy combatant” Jose Padilla’s civil damages suit against John Yoo be dismissed on qualified immunity grounds. [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:07 pm by Jeralyn
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed a district court ruling that the lawsuit filed by former detainee Jose Padilla can proceed against Bush Administration official John Yoo, who authored the infamous torture memos. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:32 pm by Kevin
The legal issue was whether John Yoo should be entitled to "qualified immunity" in a case brought by Jose Padilla, a U.S. citizen detained as an "enemy combatant. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:44 pm by Steve Vladeck
I don’t think today’s Ninth Circuit decision throwing out Jose Padilla’s damages suit against John Yoo is particularly surprising—notwithstanding the typical (albeit utterly and alarmingly inaccurate) trope about the liberal Ninth Circuit. [read post]