Search for: "Julian v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 772
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
The report stated that, on a specific setting, correct matches were made 89% of the time and there was no statistically significant gender or race bias. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am
Julian E. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Albert Julian 61. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
On 29 March 2023, judgment was handed down by Saini J in the3million & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin). [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
The News Media Association (NMA) and National Union of Journalists issued statements stating that the changes would “weaken the flow of information from police forces to the general public, undermining the public right to know. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
United States, Rule 10b-5, SEC enforcement, Securities fraud, United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
United States, Rule 10b-5, SEC enforcement, Securities fraud, United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
United States On 15 March 2023, the Colorado Attorney General’s Office finalised the rules implementing the Colorado Privacy Act. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
” 26 civil society groups, including Privacy International and Open Rights Group signed an open letter to Secretary of State, Michelle Donelan, stating that the “ill-considered proposals…endanger UK residents and UK data protection. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:02 pm
McFarland Professor of Law and co-director of the Rhode Center; Margaret Hagan, executive director of the Stanford Legal Design Lab; Julian Nyarko, associate professor of law; Norm Spaulding, the Nelson Bowman Sweitzer and Marie B. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology Michelle Donelan has refuted a reported pause on consideration of the proposed Data Protection and Digital Information Bill. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:09 pm
(Heckman v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
Last week in the courts On 8 February 2023, Julian Knowles J dismissed the defendant’s application in Dr Saeed Shehabi and Moosa Mohamme v The Kingdom of Bahrain [2023] EWHC 89 (KB) to dismiss the claim for want of jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am
On 25 January 2023, there was a hearing in the case of Forensic Risk Ltd v Akisanya (KB-2022-004582). [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
United States The Supreme Court is also expected to hear two cases – Moody v NetChoice and NetChoice v Paxton – concerning the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas, which restrict the content moderation capabilities of social media companies. [read post]
