Search for: "Justin v Justin" Results 61 - 80 of 1,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2021, 6:45 am by Justine Wong
Written by Justine Wong, 3L, University of Ottawa Law The Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB) recently… [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 2:02 pm by Alfred Brophy
Cribbing now from Justin's webpage:  Assistant Professor Justin R. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:57 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) RC3, the producers of the Joustin’ Beaver game app, are suing Justin Bieber for a declaratory judgment (RC3, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 4:08 am
Author Friedrich-Johann-Justin-Bertuch  Jane LambertIntellectual Property Enterprise Court (HH Judge Melissa Clarke) Evans v John Lewis Plc and another [2023] EWHC 766 (IPEC) (3 April 2023)  This was another copyright case that turned on whether copying could be proved. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 1:01 pm by Staci Zaretsky
This is basically a teenager turned prosti-tot trying to peddle her precious v-card on Facebook just for a chance to see the Biebs. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 6:05 pm
Barbara Ehrenreich critiqued the recent research by Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers documenting an apparent decline in self-reported happiness among women, and Wolfers is not happy. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:29 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Sam Kamin and Justin Marceau, The Facts About Ring v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 9:00 pm
Listen to HOE # 47Read the Transcribed Version of HOE #47 During Hull on Estates Podcast #47, Justin de Vries and Megan Connolly focus on the case of Rose v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 8:23 am by Howard Knopf
Here is the Statement of Claim in Hellyer et al v Justin Trudeau et al T-1789-16 launching a constitutional challenge  of the Government of Canada's jurisdiction to sign, ratify  and implement the proposed CETA. [read post]
by Melbourne Journal of International Law We are grateful to Justine Nolan for her thoughtful comments on the article, and in particular for highlighting two recent circuit court cases – Flomo v Firestone Natural Rubber Co in the Seventh Circuit and Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil Corporation in the DC Circuit – which affirm that corporations can be liable under the Alien Tort Statute (‘ATS’), contrary to the position of the Second Circuit majority in… [read post]