Search for: "KENNETH COX" Results 61 - 80 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Findlay v Grimmer (No.3) [2014] WASC 228 Kenneth Martin J considered a strike out application in relation to multiple pleas of statutory justification and plea of bad character. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
DEAR FRIENDS: The bloggers here at the 1709 Blog have decided that this will be our very last post. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 4:44 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/WRoFqI (Michael Arkfeld) Coping With eDiscovery: Practical Tips From An Experienced Litigator - http://bit.ly/UN6zC4 (Christopher Cox) Escape From Babel: The Grossman-Cormack Glossary - http://bit.ly/UMxCO7 (Ralph Losey) Ex-Employee is Not Required to Produce iPhone in Discovery - http://bit.ly/WwYvcG (Jeff Kosseff) Expert Witness: Chief Judge James Holderman Discusses eDiscovery Pilot Program - http://bit.ly/YklOHk (Jason… [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 9:55 am
When the litigation got under way in 2004, Kenneth C. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:38 am by admin
Ashmore – @kcashmore1 Jason Augustine – @augustinelaw Brandy Harman Austin @thebrandyaustin, @brandyaustinlaw Steve Autry – @autry13 Kencade Babb – @kencadeb Ann Massey Badmus – @annbadmus Bill Bailey – @bbaileylaw David Bailey – @dabjd Leigh Bailey – @leigh_bailey Trina McReynolds Bailey – @trinamcrey Lindley Bain – @lindleybain Lee Baldwin – @leebaldwin55 Marissa Balius – @marissabalius Katie Bandy – @bandykatherine,… [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:38 am by admin
Ashmore – @kcashmore1 Jason Augustine – @augustinelaw Brandy Harman Austin @thebrandyaustin, @brandyaustinlaw Steve Autry – @autry13 Kencade Babb – @kencadeb Ann Massey Badmus – @annbadmus Bill Bailey – @bbaileylaw David Bailey – @dabjd Leigh Bailey – @leigh_bailey Trina McReynolds Bailey – @trinamcrey Lindley Bain – @lindleybain Lee Baldwin – @leebaldwin55 Marissa Balius – @marissabalius Katie Bandy – @bandykatherine,… [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:58 pm by Ken
That's something that the transcendentally nutty and angry Crystal Cox has already started to do, which I will remedy when I get around to it. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  We had a post on the judgment from Dirk Voorhoof and there were a number of other comments on the judgment from, amongst others Lorna Woods, Neville Cox and Glyn Moody. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage comes from Mark Walsh of Education Week, with commentary from Kenneth Jost, who at Jost on Justice discusses an amicus brief in the case which argues that “a ruling for the religious groups also could undermine state laws protecting the right of terminally ill patients to reject extraordinary life-sustaining measures”; from Greg Lipper, who argues at Bill of Health Blog that “the science underlying the plaintiffs’ arguments that the government… [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:54 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Kenneth Vercammen & Associates Law Office helps people injured due to the negligence of others. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On 27 to 30 March 2023, Nicklin J will hear applications in the unlawful information gathering claims brought by a number of high profile figures, including Baroness Doreen Lawrence and Prince Harry, against the publishers of the Daily Mail. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Who, besides Elliot Richardson, refused to fire Archibald Cox? [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am by Ronald Collins and David Skover
Aided by their law clerks, who included Kenneth Starr (War [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Federal: Firms Recruited by Paul Manafort Investigated Over Foreign PaymentsMSN – Kenneth Vogel (New York Times) | Published: 2/5/2019 Federal prosecutors in New York have been investigating payments to three law and lobbying firms recruited by Paul Manafort to help improve the image of the president of Ukraine. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am by John Elwood
” Because this involves an interlocutory appeal of the denial of a motion to dismiss, the cases raise the question whether this is one of the categories of interlocutory orders the Supreme Court has recognized to be “final decisions” subject to immediate review under Cox Broadcasting Corp v. [read post]