Search for: "KERR v. JAMES" Results 61 - 80 of 174
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
 Lord Kerr (massively paraphrased): but has Parliament has not given citizens of the UK rights by way of the 1972 Act, and therefore would have to be consulted in order for them to be taken away? [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
Today’s live blog team comprises Lucy Hayes (Olswang), Anna Phillips (Nabarro), James Gliddon (CMS), Tom Sandeman (Nabarro), Emma Boffey (CMS) and Iona Millership (Olswang). 16.00 The Lord Advocate has now concluded his submissions for today. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 11:15 am by Orin Kerr
Kerr, Trespass, Not Fraud: The Need for New Sentencing Guidelines in CFAA Cases Matthew B. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:23 am
Kerr, Applying the FourthAmendment to the Internet: A General Approach, 62 Stan. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:01 am by Orin Kerr
This case involves allegations that James Brandon Hill committed misdemeanor theft of services in violation of OCGA § 16-8-5 when he fled without paying a fare owed to a taxi cab driver. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:56 am by Orin Kerr
I believe that no criminal defendant has won a Supreme Court case on the scope of the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule since 1990, when the court handed down James v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 5:43 am by Orin Kerr
James, 353 F.3d 606, 613 (8th Cir. 2003) (holding that accessing CDs given by defendant to a friend violated Fourth Amendment). [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2]  Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4]  At the… [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:06 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court has announced [pdf] that permission to appeal has been granted (by Lords Kerr, Wilson and Reed) in the case of PNM v Times Newspapers. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:39 pm
The order is here, and it says the following: 14-556) OBERGEFELL, JAMES, ET AL. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Orin Kerr provided audio of this week’s oral arguments in Klayman v. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Later on Tuesday, Kerr summarized the CA2 ACLU v. [read post]