Search for: "Kats v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2011, 1:41 pm
I reflected on this while reading a virtually fresh-off-the-press copy of a judgment rendered by the (IP)-influential United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth District in the case of UMG Recordings, Inc. v Troy Augusto, No. 08-55998 (January 4, 2011) here. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:56 am
Having fundamentally misunderstood the nature of invention, the United States Supreme Court has dealt a potentially disastrous blow to personalized medicine in its decision in Mayo v Prometheus, which invalidated Prometheus’s claim to a diagnostic correlation. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
See coverage on FOSS Patents, JUVE Patent, Legal Patent, and the Kluwer Patent Blog - and, of course, the IPKat - for more.Over on Comparative Patent Remedies, Thomas Cotter commented on the UK Supreme Court's recent "well-reasoned" decision in Secretary of State for Health v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 4:27 pm
What one conceives well can be stated with clarity and the words to say it come easily. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
’This morning AG Wahl proposed that the CJEU answer the questions referred by the Fővárosi Törvényszék as follows:(1) [Answering questions 1 and 2, correctly in this Kat's view] For the purposes of Article 4(3) ... [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:42 am
In US v. [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 8:31 pm
This Kat has now woken up from his winter slumber. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:04 am
As reported in most of the main news outlets this morning, the Administrative Court, wearing the face of Mr Justice Kenneth Parker, handed down its judgment yesterday in R (on the Application of British Telecommunications Plc & TalkTalk Telecom Group Plc) v The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2011] EWHC 1021 (Admin), concerning BT and TalkTalk's application for judicial review of the Digital Economy Act 2010. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:06 pm
Readers of this weblog will know that this Kat has frequently commented on cases that should never have been litigated at all, either since they are no-hopers or because, even if they can be won, the successful litigant derives no obvious benefit from winning or can derive a swifter and more effective advantage by not litigating [a very recent example of a trade mark dispute which this Kat truly thinks was futile is Galileo v OHIM and others, noted here]. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
After a hard-fought several rounds in the CJEU and the UK courts, it all seemed all over; however, the EU General Court offered us a new judgment as an early Christmas present in mid-December.The case of Mondelez UK Holdings & Services Ltd, formerly Cadbury Holdings Ltd v EUIPO dealt with an EU registered trademark (2632529) for a three-dimensional mark comprising of the Kit Kat chocolate bar without any markings. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
There's definitely something wrong ...The IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 relating to silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here, and this Kat here). [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:47 am
Mylan has stated that it intends to seek expedition of its appeal. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:45 am
| US Supreme Court rules Official Georgia Codes Annotated is ineligible for copyright protection - Georgia v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 1:34 am
In this Thanksgiving season, this Kat is grateful that the IPKat readers continue following the posts of The IPKat blog. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 12:31 am
This Kat did not have time to get round to reading Hospira v Genentech when it first emerged, and did not immediately notice that it was an entire new case in its own right, and not simply a codicil to the decision that he reported here. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 1:23 am
Professor Howard similarly stated that the skilled person could have engineered a minigene construct including rearranged V, D and J segments. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 4:42 am
Corp. v Triarc Corp., 93 NY2d 525, 529 [1999]; see Kat House Prods., LLC v Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP, 71 AD3d 580 [1st Dept 2010]). [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 9:36 am
There, the Court states that why the taste of cheese is neither precise nor objective derives from the current state of scientific development. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 3:58 pm
Explains Amit: "Justice Katju [as a Jewish Kat, Jeremy loves this name!] [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
This Kat has been waiting for months in anticipation for the ruling in the extradition proceedings involving Richard O'Dwyer. [read post]
