Search for: "Kaufman v. Court of Appeal"
Results 61 - 80
of 242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2021, 6:56 am
Circuit Court of Appeals for Hunstein v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, district courts exercising their discretion under the DJA are guided by the landmark opinion in Reifer v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, district courts exercising their discretion under the DJA are guided by the landmark opinion in Reifer v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:39 am
This position was seemingly validated by the First Department’s 2009 decision in Vukovich v. 1345 Fee, LLC. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 10:27 am
This is illustrated by a recent decision in Illinois federal court, Mladenov v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:59 am
The appeals court found that the plaintiff was no longer an aggrieved employee with PAGA standing. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 11:57 am
By Thomas Kaufman (follow me on Twitter) On December 31, 2011, as a final act for the year, the First Appellate District of the California Court of Appeal issued a good appellate decision for employers on the issue of independent contractor status, Arnold v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
Going farther than simply holding that the lower court temporary support award was inadequate, the Appellate Division, Second Department, in its September, 2015, decision in Kaufman v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:07 am
The United States Supreme Court recently issued its opinion in the case Cummings v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
Allstate appeals and raises the following dispositive issue: whether the trial court erred when it denied Allstate's motion for partial summary judgment on the bad faith claim. [read post]
18 May 2018, 12:15 pm
out of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that found an insurer that breaches its duty to defend must pay the amount of damages stipulated to between the claimant and insured unless there is “fraud or collusion,” courts have mandated that an enforceable Coblentz agreement must be reasonable in amount and entered in “good faith. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit consisting of Circuit Judges Paul V. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:31 am
Circuit Courts of Appeal have rejected this interpretation of Virginia v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:06 am
Kaufman v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:13 am
A February 18, 2014 memo from Kaufman Dolowich Voluck law firm about the Court of Appeals reversal of its earlier ruling in the K2 Investment Group case can be found here. [read post]
19 May 2014, 9:05 am
Fullerton III and Jason Kaufman In its recent decision in Santoro v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 9:05 am
Fullerton III and Jason Kaufman In its recent decision in Santoro v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 5:30 am
Kaufman v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:14 pm
By Thomas Kaufman (follow me on Twitter) On April 30, 2012, the California Supreme Court handed down Kirby v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 3:43 am
The legislation, which was modeled from provisions in an existing State contract, would have more broadly opened the door for delay claims, beyond the narrow exceptions set forth by the New York Court of Appeals in the seminal case Corinno-Civetta Construction Corp. v. [read post]
