Search for: "Kaufman v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 363
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2021, 10:38 am
In the case […] The post State of limitations on biometric data privacy claims in Illinois clarified, Biometric Update.com, featuring Stefan Dandelles, Jean Liu, Sept 20, 2021 appeared first on Kaufman Dolowich Voluck LLP. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 10:38 am
Claims relating to informed consent, data retention policy disclosure and safeguarding are subject to a five-year limit, while claims based on unlawful profit or disclosure have only a one-year time limit, the judges ruled in the case of Tims v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 3:08 pm
” Kaufman, Litwin and Feinstein v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 8:10 am
The defendant employer filed preliminary objections, arguing that plaintiff failed to state a claim for violation of the MMA or wrongful discharge. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 6:06 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm
In its June 21, 2021 decision in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 2:39 pm
In Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Today marks the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
Supreme Court in Nestlé v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 10:26 am
Today the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 4:05 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 3:06 am
Scanlon 2007-08: Carolyn V. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 11:17 am
Kaufman, 862 F.2d 236 (9th Cir. 1988)(assault); Fesler v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
The second argument of the day will be BP PLC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 11:05 am
History of Website Accessibility Cases In Andrews v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Kaufman v Anker, 42 NY2d 835, the Appellate Division opined that "[b]ased upon the record presented, the [ACS'] determination that [Plaintiff] fell short of completing the probationary period was rational and not arbitrary or capricious or contrary to law. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Kaufman v Anker, 42 NY2d 835, the Appellate Division opined that "[b]ased upon the record presented, the [ACS'] determination that [Plaintiff] fell short of completing the probationary period was rational and not arbitrary or capricious or contrary to law. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
In the case of Janus v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 5:55 pm
Kaufman, 862 F.2d 236 (9th Cir. 1988)(assault); Fesler v. [read post]