Search for: "Kearns v. Kearns" Results 61 - 80 of 104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2011, 12:30 am by Yvonne Daly
This was a decision of Kearns P. in the High Court refusing to prohibit the trial of the applicant who claimed that the absence of certain evidence would lead to a real risk of an unfair trial. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:20 am by Máiréad Enright
Of the last 5 appointments to the Supreme Court (including President of the High Court Nicholas Kearns) 4 were men. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am by INFORRM
His approach was markedly different from the established approach in a duty/interest case, particularly where there is a pre-existing relationship between publisher and publisher: compare, eg, Horrocks v Lowe [1975] AC 135 HL and Kearns v General Council of the Bar [2003] 1 WLR 1357 CA. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:14 am by Yvonne Daly
On Friday last, March 25th 2011, in ED v DPP the High Court ruled that section 12 of the Immigration Act 2004 was unconstitutional. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
However, this principle is not unlimited (see Cullen v Stanley [1926] IR 73 (SC); though quaere whether the case would be decided on its facts in the same way in the light of Quinlavan v O’Dea and Allister v Paisley above). [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In Kearns v General Council of the Bar ([2003] 1 WLR 1357), the Bar Council had published a seriously defamatory statement circulated to all heads of chambers, senior clerks and practice managers in England and Wales. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:32 pm by Buce
" This will, of course, come as a surprise to readers of Doris Kearns Goodwin or Shelby Foote, or David McCullough and their ilk. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
This can be a heavy burden, particularly where the charge is a grave one, but requiring defendants to prove truth is not incompatible with Article 10: see McVicar v UK (2002) 35 EHRR 22; Steel v UK [2005] EMLR 314. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:16 am by Colin Murray
” For Kearns J (citing McKenna v An Taoiseach (No.2) [1995] 2 I.R. 10) the issue of justiciability came down to whether the case involved “a clear disregard by the Government of the powers and duties conferred on it by the Constitution”. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:53 am by Aoife O'Donoghue
Yesterday’s High Court decision, Doherty v Government of Ireland has resulted in global coverage of the Irish Government’s reluctance to engage with democracy. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
  He relied on the English decision in Woodward v Hutchins ([1977] 1 WLR 760). [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 5:32 pm by INFORRM
  The judgment of Mr Justice Kearns is not yet available. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 2:24 am by INFORRM
  On Friday 8 October 2010 in the High Court in Dublin, Mr Justice Nicholas Kearns gave judgment in the case of Hickey v Sunday World. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am by INFORRM
Although there is Court of Appeal dicta to the contrary, (Kearns v General Council of the Bar [2003] EWCA 331.) it is submitted that this is inconsistent with dicta from the House of Lords decision in Jameel (at [54] and [118]) and that the Privy Council decision should be followed. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Enson "UCL Class Certification after In re Tobacco II Cases" by Neal Potischman, Mark Kokanovich and Julie Epley "Kearns v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 11:40 pm by INFORRM
It has been reported that an  application for prior restraint Under Ireland’s new Defamation Act 2009  has been dismissed by Justice Kearns President of the High Court. [read post]