Search for: "Kearse v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 174
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm
In the following guest post, attorneys from the Paul Weiss law firm review a recent Second Circuit decision on this issue, Waggoner v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 6:21 am
The Court of Appeals (Kearse, Jacobs and Pooler) says Soto does not. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 6:04 am
Yet another Second Circuit ruling reminds us how difficult is is to show that you suffered discrimination because other guys at work who also broke the rules were not punished.The case is Diggs v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:14 am
” Starr v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:09 am
That litigation will continue, thanks to the Court of Appeals, which finds her second lawsuit against the City of Syracuse states a plausible claim for discrimination.The case is Dotson v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 6:56 am
Municipal Credit Union, February 9, 2017, Kearse, A.). [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:14 am
The district court rejected that claim, but the Court of Appeals brings it back.The case is Coutard v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 6:57 am
In Pierce v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 7:44 am
In the end, the Second Circuit (Kearse and Straub with Wesley in dissent) says, the State Court of Appeals did not reasonably apply settled constitutional law in upholding the conviction. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:58 am
"The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Kearse and Winter) says plaintiffs were fired for-cause because they disobeyed a lawful order from management. [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:49 am
The Court of Appeals (Kearse, Walker and Cabranes) sees it differently. [read post]
3 May 2016, 7:43 am
New York State Department of Labor, decided on April 26. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:50 am
That's what happened here.The case is Munter v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:21 am
New York State Department of Law, February 5, 2016, Kearse, A.). [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 3:52 am
While the state argues that this case cannot be filed in federal court, the Court of Appeals (Kearse, Livingston and Pooler) says that "the collateral order doctrine has been held not applicable to permit immediate appeal of decisions denying motions to dismiss on the ground that plaintiffs' claims should be adjudicated in a different forum. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:34 pm
The Court of Appeals rejects the habeas petition, and that's probably the end of the line for this guy.The case is Chrysler v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 7:35 am
He loses the case, and the Court of Appeals affirms.The case is Smith v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 8:01 am
The case highlights the dangerous streets of the City and also articulates a new standard for the crime of accessory to murder after-the-fact.The case is United States v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 10:28 am
There is no such claim.The case is Morales v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:05 am
Now Online at BrokeAndBroker.com:FULL-TEXT Second Circuit Opinion in United States v. [read post]
