Search for: "Keith Lines v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 228
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm
In a session cut short by a stay from the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the military commission in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:36 am
The Ideal of Fraternity in America (University of California Press, 1973).Melville, Keith. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:59 am
” [Keith Lee thread on Twitter, with punch line being what the New York courts did by way of discipline; Jason Grant, New York Law Journal] I’m quoted disagreeing (cordially) with Sen. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm
(Keith Whittington, “Originalism: A Critical Introduction,” 82 FORDHAM L. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 3:11 pm
Over the week of Nov. 12, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 8:20 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 2:11 pm
This figure helps us look at the consistency of party-line votes by senators’ states and parties. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:44 am
This line allows members of the public to report when the smoking ban has been breached. [read post]
8 May 2018, 9:50 am
Most views cluster around the conclusion I tend to share: the question whether the President can be compelled to testify was formally left open by United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
… 18 Long v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
See Shamoun & Norman, LLP v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 7:29 am
., Thoroughgood v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 7:29 am
., Thoroughgood v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 1:06 pm
At all events, it remains the case that no one has disputed the through lines from the segregationist/states' rights rhetoric to Bork's academic argument for original and framers' intent. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:20 am
Keith Whittington argued that impeachment should not be a partisan affair. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 11:59 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:50 pm
State and Folsom v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:52 am
That case is Wilson v. [read post]
