Search for: "Kelly v. Consolidated"
Results 61 - 80
of 97
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2012, 6:55 pm
The first case, Kelly Sims v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:49 pm
Kelly, No. 2009-CV-07007 (Dauphin Co., May 13, 2011, Curcillo, J.) and Steele v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 11:13 am
In these consolidated appeals, Kelly Kamakian appeals from the circuit court’s orders rejecting his claim. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:08 am
Police Dept., 91 AD2d 898 [1983]; Gearing v Kelly, 15 AD2d 477 [1961]; Matter of O'Grady v City of New York, 164 Misc 2d 171, 173 [1995]; Matter of Spraggins v Current Cab Corp., 127 Misc 2d 774, 775 [1985]), it has also been recognized as an appropriate device for ascertaining the identities of prospective defendants (see Matter of Alexander v Spanierman Gallery, LLC, 33 AD3d 411 [2006];" "A second mechanism, available when a… [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 7:15 am
Kelly, 140 AD2d 993 (4th Dept. 1988); McCarter v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:36 pm
The Tafas v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 11:30 am
Cosgrove et al., Phila, July Term, 2008, no. 3708 (request to sever UIM claim and third party claim denied) and Kelly Hess v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:03 am
Kelly said. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:12 am
Luzerne July 24, 2009), that the preliminary objection filed by a tortfeasor defendant seeking to sever a third party claim from a consolidated UIM claim should be overruled.In the case of Gingrich v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
Kelly Hess v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:10 am
Philadelphia, July Term, 2008, no. 3708; Kelly Hess v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:43 am
Kelly Hess v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 12:18 pm
Kelly Hess v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
Bill Kelly Co., 849 S.W.2d 380, 384 (Tex. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(China Law Blog) ‘Class’ justice in trademark rights: Lan Kwai Fong (IP Dragon) Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court: Unilever’s ice cream KING CONE did not infringe Danish trademark KING COOL (Class 46) New Danish rules on valuation of IP (Innovationpartners) Europe CFI: Lange Uhren watch shape appeal dismissed: Lange Uhren GmbH v OHIM (Class 46) CFI: no similarity between "MANGO adorably" and ADIORABLE:… [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 8:31 am
Cosgrove et al, Phila, July Term, 2008, no. 3708;Kelly Hess v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 12:31 pm
Chief Justice Kelly dissented. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 6:44 pm
Kelly). [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:37 pm
Kelly). [read post]
