Search for: "King v. American Power"
Results 61 - 80
of 848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Bull and McCulloch v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Bulland McCulloch v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
For Dworkin—and many American constitutional theorists of the second half of the twentieth century—the existing story made Brown v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
What they wanted was freedom from parliamentary control—the “sovereignty” of the “King in Parliament”—and genuine self-government. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Federal theory in the twentieth century is first developed by institutionalist political scientists, such as Kenneth Wheare, who took the American federation as a lodestar.[8] Thus, the result of Texas v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
The summer of our discontents Two months ago, if you prompted Version 3 of the AI-art generator MidJourney to generate depictions of an “otter on a plane using wifi,” you were rewarded with the nonsense in the left panel of our lead graphic. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
What it was attempting to do was to make the point that the Supreme Court had never come close to offering a cogent analysis of what it actually meant by “one person/one vote” and therefore the mantra of “equality” in voting power, which, after all, was the basis of Reynolds v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:38 am
A draft decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
It is within its authority and powers to do so.[2] But I also argue that it is not in members’ interest to do so. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am
Not long after I finished reading, I felt eerily reminded of another antitrust complaint involving games, platforms (iOS), and even the subscription model (Apple Arcade): Pistacchio v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
Jackson’s wise words to his fellow Americans in 1945: It is futile to think, as extreme nationalists do, that we can have an international law that is always working on our side. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 9:31 am
Polansky v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 9:43 am
As evidence, they point to King v. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
In the didactic genre (or subgenre), “mirrors for princes,” philosophers instruct kings and princes how to rule. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Rev. 56, 63–66 (2015) (suggesting after King v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 5:18 pm
King & Pamela K. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 2:40 am
Contents include: Naomi Egel & Steven Ward, Hierarchy, revisionism, and subordinate actors: The TPNW and the subversion of the nuclear order Marius Wishman & Charles Butcher, Beyond ethnicity: historical states and modern conflict Hoo Tiang Boon, International identity construction: China’s pursuit of the responsible power identity and the American Other Tobias Berger, Worldmaking from the margins: interactions between domestic and international ordering in… [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:03 am
In Evans v. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 9:04 pm
Bruen, Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Not surprisingly, I don’t see any persuasive argument for giving Wyoming and California equal voting power. [read post]
