Search for: "King v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY" Results 61 - 80 of 233
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am by Andrew Koppelman
  He talked David into being the Libertarian vice presidential candidate in 1980, because he was too busy running the family company to do it.) [read post]
10 May 2017, 10:20 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While many excellent reasons may exist for a business to offer group health coverage for qualifying employees, all employers regardless of size considering offering group health coverage obtained through the SHOP or other sources should keep in mind that employers that establish and maintain group health coverage, the group health plans they establish and the company or persons with discretionary authority or responsibility for the maintenance, management or administration of these programs… [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
McKinney School of Law, Health Privacy Fragmentation Law, Medicine & Bioethics Session 1D – Room 345Thinking Differently About Surgical Law and EthicsModerator: Sylvia Caley, Georgia State University College of Law, “Extraordinary Measures: Special Considerations for the Unbefriended Patient”Kelly Dineen, Saint Louis University School of Law, Amending the Sunshine Act to Reflect Device Company Gifts to SurgeonsSamantha Johnson, Grady Health System, Extraordinary… [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 See, Businesses Must Confirm & Clean Up Health Plan ACA & Other Compliance Following Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:56 pm by Patrick E. Knie
Burger King Corporation Federal Court in South Carolina Rules that Golf Cart Accident Was Not Covered Under Manufactured Home Insurance Policy – American Southern Home Insurance Company v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:56 pm by Patrick E. Knie
Burger King Corporation Federal Court in South Carolina Rules that Golf Cart Accident Was Not Covered Under Manufactured Home Insurance Policy – American Southern Home Insurance Company v. [read post]