Search for: "King v. State Bar (1990)"
Results 61 - 80
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2015, 7:39 am
In the 1990s, several States sought to expand access to coverage by imposing a pair of insurance market regulations—a “guaranteed issue” requirement, which bars insurers from denying coverage to any person because of his health, and a “community rating” requirement, which bars insurers from charging a person higher premiums for the same reason. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 5:25 am
Many of the more senior among the current prescription medical product liability defense bar cut our teeth during the vaccine wars of the 1980s/1990s. [read post]
7 May 2015, 6:17 am
From the King County Bar Association Law Bulletin: State v Shale – Supreme Court Moves Washington in the Wrong Tribal Direction A somewhat random excerpt: The Court’s opinion is primarily based on its wholly mistaken belief that when Public Law 280 was passed by Congress in the 1950s and enacted and amended by Washington in the 1960s, “neither this state nor the federal government would have understood that… [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Now that the elder law bar has seen several copies of the MassHealth Essay, it is clear why the Office of Medicaid has shielded the MassHealth Essay from public release. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Now that the elder law bar has seen several copies of the MassHealth Essay, it is clear why the Office of Medicaid has shielded the MassHealth Essay from public release. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:59 am
State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
The Fredericksburg Care Company LP v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 5:32 am
In the first case, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ultimately ruled that the claims of the Native American petitioners were barred by laches. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 9:00 am
Rob Glicksman and I have done a review of federal decisions reviewing EPA decisions in the 1990s in which we found that in these so-called Chevron Step Two cases, EPA won 93% of them. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:31 am
The case helped bring an end to the death penalty in New York and was cited by the United States Supreme Court in the 1966 Miranda v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:22 am
The court further cited Judge King’s ruling in Bednar v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reached the exact opposite conclusion in King v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:13 am
This is a point that many thinkers have made (in a recent essay I referred to the positive v. negative peace and direct v. structural violence concepts of Martin Luther King, Jr. and John Galtung). [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
A quality of life survey by the North Carolina Bar Association in the early 1990s, revealed that almost 26% of respondents exhibited symptoms of clinical depression, and almost 12% said they contemplated suicide at least once a month. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm
R.S.O. 1990, c. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit invalidated an Illinois law barring most people from publicly carrying loaded guns in Moore v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
The holding in Adams – that the strict liability claims were barred by the statute of limitations applicable to malpractice claims – is suggestive that no separate cause of action for strict liability exists, but that’s not the ruling. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
” The bar for originality is low; it requires only a “modicum of creativity. [read post]
