Search for: "King v. Sullivan" Results 61 - 80 of 161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2010, 6:33 am
Gelstein,  the New York Court of Appeals noted: Under the [New York] Times [Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254)] malice standard, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the “statements [were] made with [a] high degree of awareness of their probable falsity” (Garrison v Louisiana, 379 US 64, 74). [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Mimesis Law, Andrew King looks at Packingham v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:00 am
Berman KINGS COUNTYTorts Questions Remain if Dog Owner Contributed To Allowing Dog on Sidewalk, Plaintiff's Injury Pisano v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
 Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964), this form of political speech must remain `uninhibited, robust, and wide-open. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 1:39 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Yang Liu and Brandon Vines discussed the impact of Louisiana v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Sullivan,] the 1964 decision that the Constitution creates a higher barrier for public figures to claim libel. [read post]