Search for: "King v. United States Government CASE TRANSFERRED" Results 61 - 80 of 176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Appellate Division, Second Department, recently recognized this governing principle in an analogous case, Payne v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 11:40 am by Caitlin Gilligan, Rishabh Bhandari
Saudi Arabia had owned the two islands until 1950 when the Saudi government transferred them to Egypt out of fear that Israel might seize them. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
An Oklahoma jury has ordered a former state legislator to pay $4.3 million to an insurance company in a defamation case. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:33 am by Rick St. Hilaire
US Attorney Richard Callahan responded on March 16 by initiating a lawsuit against the mummy mask.In a complaint titled United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 1:19 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Practice Government Denied Discovery Into Intervenor's Ties to Organized Crime in Union Contempt Case United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 4:30 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
“These elements must be established by clear and convincing evidence” (Jones v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-29, have now been rescheduled three times. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
  In yet another state-on-top habeas case, Burt v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 7:23 am by Ashly Sands
§ 602 for importing watches manufactured in Switzerland and intended for sale abroad into the U.S. without Omega’s authorization, the Ninth Circuit struck down Costco’s use of Quality King Distributors Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The trial in the case of Unnadkat v Patel.will not now commence on 18 July 2016 as the case has settled. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 11:03 am
Defendant's counsel noted that she recently became a United States citizen. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But that traditional formulation is over-determinative; after all, Article II provides that “[t]he executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America,” and yet no one doubts that the President may transfer executive authority to his underlings in the Executive Branch. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am by Lyle Denniston
Florida (10-1139), raising the issue of whether a state government interferes with foreign policy by barring state college professors from using any funds to visit Cuba or any other “terrorist state”; and Republica Bolivariana de Venezuela, et al., v. [read post]