Search for: "Koh v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2012, 12:46 am
That's because the preliminary injunction is on appeal and, currently, before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 12:26 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has just given notice of a scheduling decision. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 1:54 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has good news for Samsung, and Samsung has already shared it with Judge Koh in a late-night filing. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:51 am
United States District Judge Lucy H. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:30 am
No Permanent Injunction for Apple in Samsung Patent BattleYesterday, the Judge Koh of the United States District Court for the Federal Circuit denied Apple's request for a permanent injunction in their ongoing patent war over smartphones with Samsung. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 8:38 pm
Judge Koh's order states that this was "troubling". [read post]
16 May 2022, 4:00 am
Frohen, Common Good Constitutionalism and the Problem of Administrative Absolutism, (April 14, 2022).Jennifer Lee Koh, Race, Immigration Law, and Christianity: Reflections and Tensions Raised by United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:24 pm
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, famous for (among other high-profile cases) FTC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 3:08 pm
”***Remember United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 2:01 pm
" That is what the United States Attorneys Office, Southern District of New York, contends in its objection filed yesterday in the case of United States Of America v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 10:26 am
”)While recognizing a very narrow preclusive presidential power that prohibits Congress from contradicting a position the President has previously taken on the political recognition of a foreign government, the Zivotofsky Court calls into fatal question its 1936 discussion in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:52 pm
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to grant a conventional antisuit injunction, even though there would actually be valid policy reasons to do so.On two other occasions, this blog accurately predicted antisuit injunctions barring patent holders from the overseas enforcement of SEP injunctions: Microsoft v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 11:12 pm
No. 3015), to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit".A notice of appeal always has the broadest scope, but in a complex case like this, appellants typically later focus on a limited number of key issues. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:33 pm
And the only way to find out is to let push come to shove.Judge Koh may dread the notion but we'll probably see more Apple v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 9:10 pm
(I see a fairly high likelihood of a post-appeal retrial anyway when I compare the damages theories allowed by Judge Koh to what the highest-ranking U.S. patent judge, Chief Judge Randall Rader of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, said on September 11, 2013 about a Motorola damages claim against Apple. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 12:41 pm
"Three weeks ago, Apple and Samsung agreed to withdraw all litigation pending between them outside the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 1:54 am
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Avanci, Nokia et al.'s motion to transfer Continental's U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
Last month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued a disappointing decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 3:02 am
Kerry Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International LawKristina Daugirdas & Julian Davis Mortenson, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law Recent Books on International LawJosé E. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 11:50 am
The case is Presidio Components v. [read post]
