Search for: "Kurt Lash"
Results 61 - 80
of 225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2018, 8:28 am
Yesterday the National Constitution Center released an hour-long podcast that I did with Kurt Lash on John Bingham and the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 10:46 am
(Neil Siegel, guest-blogging) I learned from Kurt Lash’s new article, which makes novel and creative claims about historical materials that are important to a variety of theories of constitutional interpretation. [read post]
18 May 2010, 5:57 pm
Lash argues that the drafting history shows that the Fourteenth Amendment was intended to protect every part of Amendments I through VIII, but not to protect any unenumerated rights. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 7:48 am
Today I received my two-volume set of this treasure edited by Kurt Lash. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 7:43 am
https://ij.org/sc_long_podcast/the-fight-for-the-14th/ I am one of the participants, along with Kurt Lash and others. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 7:32 am
Kurt Lash, University of Richmond School of Law, weighs in on the constitutional controversy of the moment with The Meaning and Ambiguity of Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment:Thaddeus Stevens (LC)Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment disqualified anyone from serving in the House or Senate, or as a presidential elector, if they had betrayed their oath of fealty to United States and joined the Confederacy during the American Civil War. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm
Kurt T. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
First up, is a lecture by Kurt Lash, "Leaving the Chisholm Trail: The Eleventh Amendment and the Background Principle of Strict Construction". [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 9:07 am
Kurt Lash is the E. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 7:35 am
Kurt T. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Kurt Lash, The Reconstruction Amendments: The Essential Documents (University of Chicago Press, 2021)(2 vols.).Bradley Rebeiro In his introduction to his two volumes of essential Reconstruction documents, Kurt Lash explains that he sought to produce a collection that would be neither excessively long nor unhelpfully narrow. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 10:00 am
Kurt T. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 10:08 pm
(Eugene Volokh) An excellent new blog from the Federalist Society, with posts about recent and fairly recent Supreme Court decisions (so far mostly the health care cases, though also Citizens United) from Richard Epstein, John McGinnis, Rick Garnett, Nick Rosenkranz, Eileen O’Connor, Brad Smith, Kurt Lash, Rick Esenberg, and Joel Alicea — check it out. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 6:32 pm
“Trump Should Not Be Disqualified by an Ambiguous Clause”: Law professor Kurt Lash has this guest essay online at The New York Times. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Maryland (Oxford University Press, 2019).We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including Mark Graber (Maryland), Mark Killenbeck (Arkansas), Kurt Lash (Richmond), Sanford Levinson (Texas), Christina Mulligan (Brooklyn), Victoria Nourse (Georgetown), Richard Primus (Michigan), Franita Tolson (USC), and myself.At the conclusion, David will respond to the commentators. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:01 pm
Foley, Mark Graber, Rebecca Green, Gretchen Helmke, Sherrilyn Ifill, Sam Issacharoff, Kurt Lash, Lisa Manheim, Derek Muller, and Daniel… Continue reading The post Watch Archived Video of Safeguarding Democracy Project Conference: “The Law and Politics of Potentially Disqualifying Donald Trump from Running for President” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:55 am
In his SSRN paper, Kurt Lash has argued that my views about Resolution VI rest on "a historical mistake. [read post]
24 May 2022, 9:04 am
"] Professor Kurt Lash wrote a timely essay that analyzes Roe and the Thirteenth Amendment. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 6:24 pm
Kurt T. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:41 am
I want to draw your attention to a superb article by Kurt Lash that came out in January about the Privileges or Immunities Clause. [read post]
