Search for: "L E C Trucking Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
: (IPBiz) Pharma & Biotech - Products Abilify (Aripiprazole) – Otsuka files US patent infringement suit against Teva over seeking approval for generic Abilify: (IP Law360), Aricept (Donepezil) – US federal judge grants Eisai’s request for preliminary injunction blocking Teva from marketing generic version of Aricept: (IP Law360), (Orange Book Blog), Carbatrol (Carbamazepine) – US federal judge delivers mixed ruling in Shire… [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 18 February 2022, judgement was given in favour of the claimants in the defamation claim Thunder Studios Inc (California) v Kazal (No 12) [2022] FCA 110. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 11:06 am
Buschmann issued his decision April 4, 2006. *** C&K Insulation, Inc. (3-CA-24151; 347 NLRB No. 71) Binghamton, NY July 31, 2006. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am by Chris Wesner
: (Jointly Administered) OPINION AND ORDER ON DEBTORS’ MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A FINAL ORDER (I) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO PAY CERTAIN PREPETITION CLAIMS OF (A) CRITICAL VENDORS, (B) LIEN CLAIMANTS, (C) SHIPPERS, AND (D) ROYALTY AND LEASEHOLD CLAIMANTS, (II) CONFIRMING ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE PRIORITY STATUS OF OUTSTANDING ORDERS, AND (III) GRANTING RELATED RELIEF (DOC. 8) I. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
BIC USA, Inc., 136 F.Supp.2d 196, 207-208 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (Consumer Product Safety Commission) (“The CPSC regulations establish general, rudimentary and minimal requirements. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
The ordinance did not fall within the unusual circumstances exception in Guidelines section 15300.2(c) because global impact studies regarding the life cycle of various types of bags did not constitute substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that the ordinance would have a significant impact on the environment. [read post]