Search for: "L. Smith" Results 61 - 80 of 4,068
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2024, 4:36 am by Beatrice Yahia
U.S. law enforcement officials conducted a multi-year inquiry into allegations that allies of Mexico’s president, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, met with and took millions of dollars from drug cartels after he took office, according to U.S. records and three people familiar with the matter. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
" See Joseph Isenbergh, Impeachment and Presidential Immunity from Judicial Process, 18 Yale L. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Along with other accounting manipulation, this contributed to the situation in the UK described by leading analyst Terry Smith: “…much of the apparent growth in profits which had occurred in the 1980s was the result of accounting sleight of hand rather than genuine economic growth…[2]. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am by Eugene Volokh
[The decision allows such pseudonymity when the defendant has already been found (by default judgment) to have committed the assault, but Judge Wilkinson's concurrence argues that, absent this unusual factor, one-sided pseudonymity should be frowned on.] [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Cheffins (University of Cambridge), on Thursday, February 15, 2024 Tags: Corporate governance, corporate governance codes, enforcement, Externalities, Fairness, hypothetical bargaining model, public choice theory, regulation, transaction costs Americas board priorities 2024 Posted by Kris Pederson, Barton Edgerton, and Jamie Smith (EY), on Thursday, February 15, 2024 Tags: 2024, AI, Americas, Capital allocation, Climate change, corporate boards, Cybersecurity, Data Privacy, Director,… [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Cheffins (University of Cambridge), on Thursday, February 15, 2024 Tags: Corporate governance, corporate governance codes, enforcement, Externalities, Fairness, hypothetical bargaining model, public choice theory, regulation, transaction costs Americas board priorities 2024 Posted by Kris Pederson, Barton Edgerton, and Jamie Smith (EY), on Thursday, February 15, 2024 Tags: 2024, AI, Americas, Capital allocation, Climate change, corporate boards, Cybersecurity, Data Privacy, Director,… [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
By Suzanna Neal and the Center for Art Law Team On January 30th, 2024, the trial of Accent Delight International Ltd. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:59 am by Brian Finucane
On Thursday evening, the White House published a document entitled, “National Security Memorandum on Safeguards and Accountability With Respect to Transferred Defense Articles and Defense Services” (NSM-20). [read post]
Did Former Dempsey Lord Smith Broker Arni Diamond Sell You GWG L Bonds? [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:35 am by fjhinojosa
Smith Schlinck, OK, Zoomer: Teaching Legal Research to Gen Z, 115 Law Libr. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 10:30 am by Sherica Celine
Watch this EEOC investigations and determinations video by Amanda Brown of Reed Smith LLP. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
Website: http://cates1980.wixsite.com/cateswebsite Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/robert.piller.3979  Jeffrey Smith GE SOIL MICROBES NEW TARGET FOR AGRICHEMICAL COMPANIES. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
In advance of the International Court of Justice’s ruling on Friday, we asked several leading experts if they would provide us with their views on the judicial order once it was issued. [read post]