Search for: "LANGLEY v. US "
Results 61 - 80
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2010, 10:21 am
Such was the case in Langley v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:12 pm
In today’s case (Mavi v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am
Significantly, there is no right of appeal to the Crown Court against a decision of the magistrates' to vary (or not to vary) an ASBO; one must either seek judicial review or appeal by way of case stated - Langley v Preston Crown Court [2008] EWHC 2623 (Admin). [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am
Significantly, there is no right of appeal to the Crown Court against a decision of the magistrates' to vary (or not to vary) an ASBO; one must either seek judicial review or appeal by way of case stated - Langley v Preston Crown Court [2008] EWHC 2623 (Admin). [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:46 am
I use it to promote Dale Langley & Co. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 1:14 am
Although the facts and history are odd, there is some useful material in HHJ Pelling QC's judgment which may be of wider relevance in such cases. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 6:31 am
Besides echoing the Langley v. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
Other sources claim tiles or pottery-shards were used.) [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 11, 2008 US v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 11:37 am
CA6 Home PUBLISHED OPINIONS Opinion Short Title/District 08a0388p.06 Robert Langley v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 6:59 am
Ashley Langley v (1) Preston Crown Court (2) West Lancashire DC (3) The Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWHC 2623 (Admin) concerns the routes of appeal from an order varying an ASBO. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 7:24 pm
As Lambert J.A. suggested in MacDonald v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
V. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:30 pm
Langley, 33 M.J. 278 (C.M.A. 1991). [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 7:50 am
Cystic Fibrosis Chapter 6917 Arlington Road, Suite 308 Bethesda, MD 20814 Phone: (301) 657-8444; (877) 657-8444 (Toll Free) Fax: (301) 652-9571 E-mail: metro-dc@cff.org Web: http://www.cff.orgmetrodc.htm Developmental Disabilities State Developmental Disabilities Planning Council MD Developmental Disabilities Council 300 West Lexington Street, Box 10 Baltimore, MD 21201-2323 Phone: (410) 333-3688 (V/TTY); (800) 305-6441 (Toll Free in MD only) E-mail: info@md-council.org Web:… [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 07a0379p.06 Langley v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 8:01 pm
For lessons in doing both, let's compare two passages from Atkins v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 8:01 pm
For lessons in doing both, let's compare two passages from Atkins v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 1:57 am
The final sentence of 35 USC 103(a), entirely unaffected by KSR v. [read post]
