Search for: "LJ" Results 61 - 80 of 2,403
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2023, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
 Asplin LJ noted four key points relevant to the issue of when a court would not accept undertakings (or grant an injunction). [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
A preliminary trial on meaning due to be heard last week has had to be relisted after actor Noel Clarke disinstructed his legal advisors shortly before the hearing. [read post]
The Court of Appeal, with Sir Christopher Floyd giving the leading judgment, and Arnold LJ and King LJ in agreement, allowed the appeal, overturning the first instance decision and finding the patent at issue invalid. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:42 am by Rose Hughes
Arnold LJ in the appeal case ([2023] EWCA Civ 472) also did not make a clear distinction between plausibility for sufficiency and plausibility for inventive step. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
  Dingemans LJ and Garnham J held that requests for documents by public inquiries were “bound to lead to the inclusion of some irrelevant material”, but that did not make the request unlawful. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
Warby LJ’s three-year term will run from 1 June 2023. 5RB has more information here. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Introduction The recent Bencher election for the Law Society of Ontario (the “LSO”) was a heated and political affair. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am by INFORRM
Warby LJ and Mostyn J held that the first instance Judge had correctly conducted the balancing process when concluding that the requirements of open justice outweighed the claimant’s right to private life in this case. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
As Rose LJ observed in the Court of Appeal, a bridge-like structure for carrying water is what “immediately comes to mind”, an observation that reflects that common meaning. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during April 2023  Eleven consistory court judgments were circulated in April concerning: Reordering, extensions and other building works CCVT Exhumation Churchyards and burials Organs This summary also includes CDM Decisions and Safeguarding, Reports from the Independent Reviewer, Privy Council Business, Visitations, and CFCE Determinations, as well as links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 5:52 am by David Pocklington
  [2] C Hill, “Note on the theology of burial in relation to some contemporary questions”, (2004) 7 Ecc LJ 447. [3] As amended by the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and Care of Churches Measure 2018, Schedule 3, Part 2, the Faculty Jurisdiction (Amendment) Rules 2019 and the Faculty Jurisdiction (Amendment) Rules 2022. [4] See Columbaria in churches – a short note. (11 August 2021). [5] A vault (French voûte, from Italian volta) is a self-supporting… [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am by familoo
Abbasi & Anor v Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2023] EWCA Civ 331 is an appeal judgment, which arises from the challenge by two sets of parents to continuing reporting restriction orders (RROs) that were made during separate proceedings about their children in relation to their end of life care. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
In Pfizer, Birss LJ declined to give a declaration because there were not any UK rights. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
The Hilary Legal Term ends on Wednesday 5 April 2023. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:13 am by Giles Peaker
Zaman v London Borough of Waltham Forest and Uduezue v Bexley LBC (2023) EWCA Civ 322 These were two joined second appeals from section 204 appeals, both on the issue of whether the local authorities had lawfully discharged duty following decisions that ‘out of borough’ private sector accommodation was suitable for the applicants. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
Having regard to Re Blagdon Cemetery [2002] Fam 299, and to the paper presented to the Court by Bishop Christopher Hill on the Theology of Burial [“A Note on the theology of burial in relation to some contemporary questions”, (2004) 7 Ecc LJ 447], de Mestre Ch. determined that there were sufficient exceptional circumstances to justify the grant of a faculty. [read post]