Search for: "LORD V. STATE"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,031
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2023, 1:40 am
Simon Hoare, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (and, we learned, the Government’s Minister for Faith), replied. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
Secondly, it claims, in effect, that the Master of the Rolls’ private researches demonstrates the law, as stated in the leading text book, to be not only wrong but unarguable. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 10:53 am
As Lord Kitchin stated, Dr. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm
In McDonnell v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
This limited release of information is to ensure the art market’s understanding and acceptance of the final determination.[16] The most famous art arbitration concerned Maria Altmann and her efforts to recover six Gustav Klimt paintings from the Republic of Austria.[17] These paintings originally belonged to her uncle and aunt but were confiscated by the Nazis in 1938, eventually ending up in the Austrian State Gallery in Vienna. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:33 am
” The trial Judge’s decision was based on various authorities, from Fielding v Variety Inc [1967] 2 QB 841 (CA) to BHX v GRX [2021] EWHC 770 (QB), and the lower court ultimately dismissed the libel and slander claims for want of serious harm. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
Carly Forrest et al, Lexology: Vicarious Liability in Scotland – the retreat continues: on the recent Inner House judgment in C & S v Shaw and Live Active Leisure [2023] CSIH 36. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 8:13 pm
In any case, Price v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
The United States now uses a life + 70 copyright regime, but only for works created on and after January 1, 1978. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
The Data Protection and Digital Information Bill has passed through the House of Commons and will now proceed to the House of Lords for consideration. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm
The Supreme Court, in Lord Sales judgment, restates the starting position, as per R v East Sussex County Council, Ex p Tandy (1998) AC 714, that where Parliament imposes a statutory duty on a public authority to provide a specific benefit or service, it does so on the footing that the authority must be taken to have the resources available to comply with that duty. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 8:00 am
The working group will also hear a presentation comparing the privacy risks of legacy v. non-legacy systems. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 3:39 am
However, a Member of the House of Lords, Lord Holmes of Richmond, has proposed a Private Members’ Bill. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:37 am
Former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, Tom Bingham, in his book “The Rule of Law”, while explaining the rule of fair trial cited a House of Lords’s case “Regina v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 6:56 am
From McQueen v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
The natural and ordinary meaning Citing Lord Bridge in Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65, Master Bell emphasised that in order to determine the natural and ordinary meaning of the words of which a plaintiff complains, one must consider the context in which the words were used and the mode of publication [8]. [read post]
