Search for: "Labelle v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 8,151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2015, 1:50 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 784 F.3d 1335, 1341-45 (10th Cir. 2015)(finding no federal regulation that paralleled state common law claimsand further concluding that state law off-label promotion claim was preempted by § 360k); United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:46 am
  Only video games rated "EC," or "early childhood", would be exempt from the labeling requirement.It is possible that this requirement of near-universal labeling is an attempt to avoid the recent Supreme Court decision in Brown v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 4:14 pm
Good that the federal cigarette labeling statute does not preempt claims that tobacco companies violated state consumer protection laws in their marketing of light cigarettes. [read post]
19 May 2009, 5:00 am
" Id. at *49.Along the way, the court applied Twombley in the context of this drug promotion case and cited Bridge v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 1:47 pm
The first case of the day will be Altria Group and Phillip Morris v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 6:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This Article demonstrates that—as suggested in the dissenting opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 2:57 pm by John J. Sullivan
  In any event, while some courts get caught up in this argument, others – like the court in Caplinger v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm by Bexis
  Maybe, if the decision described off-label use as favorably as Layzer v. [read post]