Search for: "Lambert v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 237
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2016, 6:13 am
Meigs, Lincoln’s General, Master Builder of the Union Army is also reviewed in the newspaper.Nicholas Syrett's American Child Bride: A History of Minors and Marriage in the United States is reviewed at Slate. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
United States. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
As Thom Lambert argues in chapter six, the Court has shown a greater willingness to use antitrust to police horizontal restraints of trade than vertical restraints or unilateral conduct. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 11:51 am
App. 1990); Lambert v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm
To support this position, Ryan cites an Eighth Circuit case, United States v Barrow, in which the court required a “deficiency in appointed counsel’s representation,” rather than simple “unwillingness … to communicate with counsel,” as well as the arguably similar cases of Stenson v Lambert and Hunter v Delo. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm
, Amy Lambert and Louise Benski, Privacy and Information Law Blog. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
Warner-Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2nd Cir., 2007), aff’d by an equally divided court sub nom, Warner-Lambert Co., LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
As Wikipedia explains, [i]n the United States, removal jurisdiction refers to the right of a defendant to move a lawsuit filed in state court to the federal district court for the federal judicial district in which the state court sits. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (apparently named Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) tells all.* Letter from AmeriKat: Remember fair use before issuing DMCA notices, warns Ninth CircuitAnnsley takes a gander at a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the famous case Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that mark alone identifies… [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
The main claim at issue is a Swiss form claim, and although this is significant for the present case, much less turns on it than in the other saga ongoing at the moment of Warner Lambert v Actavis (latest instalment here). [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
.* Monarchy in the United States: validity is king, for patents at any rateThis is the first post from Jeremy on IPBC Global 2015 Intellectual Property Business Conference of San Francisco. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
On May 26, 2015, the Solicitor General’s office responded to the United States Supreme Court’s Oct. 14, 2014 invitation for the government’s views on the certioraripetition filed in Athena Cosmetics, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 3:47 am
The Innovation Protection Act - which concerns funding of the United Stated Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).The pace of reform happening in the US is quite astounding and impressive. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:26 am
The Second Circuit also recognized that Lambert was at odds with the United States Supreme Court decision in Kasten v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:00 am
On appeal, the Second Circuit relied heavily on a 2011 United States Supreme Court opinion, Kasten v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
.* Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 4: harmony between parties in ‘lyrical’ patent disputeLast Thursday, Jeremy reported a High Court Order obtained by Warner-Lambert (part of the Pfizer group) mandating the NHS to release guidance about the prescribing of pregabalin (Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group PTC EHF & Others[2015] EWHC 485 (Pat) (02 March 2015)) [on which see the IPKat earlier posts, here and here]. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 10:20 pm
Here’s an interesting new case on the scope of cell phone warrants: United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
In a decision that is only moderately Arnoldian (139 paragraphs), Mr Justice Arnold refused today to grant an interim injunction that Warner Lambert had requested against Actavis [Warner -Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) (21 January 2015)]. [read post]
