Search for: "Lambeth v. Lambeth"
Results 61 - 80
of 278
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2017, 2:28 pm
Thus just as they flouted Resolution 1.10 from the 1998 Lambeth Conference in 2003, when they approved the consecration of Bishop V. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:13 pm
For these reasons the present case is indistinguishable from authorities such as Kay v Lambeth LBC [2005] QB 352 at paragraphs 107-8 and Austin v Southwark LBC [2010] HLR 1 So, the right to buy did not engage A1P1. [read post]
8 May 2016, 2:31 pm
O, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth [2016] EWHC 937 (Admin) A judicial review of a decision on a s.17 Children Act 1989 assessment of a homeless, non-eligible family. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:31 pm
We’ve seen a note of judgment) This was an appeal of a possession order made against Mr Bali at Lambeth County Court. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm
We have seen such agreements raised before, for instance in London Borough of Southwark v Ofogba [2012] EWHC 1620 (QB), Lambeth LBC v Thomas (1997) 30 HLR 89 and Rochdale MBC v Dixon [2011] EWCA Civ 1173. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 12:48 pm
Niema Abdusemed v Lambeth LBC (2016) QBD (Admin) (Ouseley J) 19/02/2016 (Not on Bailli yet. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:13 pm
He decided to leave the gathering on its second day, and explained his reasons in an announcement that castigated Canterbury's manipulation of the discussion process.It turns out that many of the other Primates attending were new to the game, and had little understanding of the divisive steps taken by ECUSA in 2003 with the consecration of Bishop V. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 12:47 pm
The Primates' Meeting, as we see, is being bypassed in favor of a gathering of primates; whether another Lambeth Conference will be called is doubtful; and no one particularly cares whether or not the Anglican Consultative Council continues to meet, because it has lost its constituencies in the debacle over the Anglican Covenant.In short, the fabric of the Anglican Communion is torn, exactly as predicted by the primates in 2003 before ECUSA took the step which the Communion asked it… [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 1:42 pm
Thomson v LB Southwark, Lambeth County Court, 30 September 2015 The tenant of a flat in a lock complained of water penetration from the flat above, and from the outside from 2009, ill fitting and draughty windows an intermittently blocked kitchen sink and defective works to the bathroom. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 4:48 pm
(He can do this with regard to the Lambeth Conference and the Primates Meeting, both of which convene at his invitation. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:38 pm
The same Court has provided the second part of the answer in Firoozmand v LB Lambeth [2015] EWCA Civ 952, this time in connection with accommodation offered in discharge of the s.193 duty. [read post]
6 May 2015, 8:11 am
In later cases, the House of Lords likewise resisted attempts to use Art 8 as a defence to possession proceedings by local authorities: see Lambeth LBC v Kay [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 AC 465; [2006] HLR 22; Birmingham CC v Doherty [2008] UKHL 57, [2009] 1 AC 367, [2008] HLR 45. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:50 pm
Their argument that s.213A, Housing Act 1996 had changed the relevant principles of law (as expounded in R (Stewart) v LB Wandsworth, LB Lambeth, LB Hammersmith & Fulham [2001] EWHC Admin 709) was also rejected at [47] (not an uninteresting argument though, unlikely to be sufficient to enable them to appeal). [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:06 pm
(Jewell's Lessee v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:30 am
The High Ct rejected that since, as a House of Lords decision, it was binding and none of the post-HRA exceptions identified in Kay v Lambeth applied. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 5:06 pm
Holmes v Lambeth LBC, Lambeth County Court Leaseholder of a two-bedroom maisonette complained of disrepair from 2008. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 1:50 am
Two months after his departure, the Lambeth Borough Council forced entry to his flat for fear that he had passed away therein. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 2:15 pm
Loveridge v London Borough of Lambeth [2014] UKSC 65 So, if a local authority unlawfully evicts a secure tenant (and yes, it happens) what should the measure of damages be? [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
The appellant sought damages for the eviction and Lambeth County Court awarded him £90,500 in damages after considering the valuation exercise of s 28 of the 1988 Act, and £9,000 at common law in respect of the trespass of his goods. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:30 am
Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Lambeth v Loveridge, heard 21 October 2014. [read post]
