Search for: "Langley v State"
Results 61 - 80
of 85
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2011, 5:58 am
") AC31880 - State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
United States Can Co., 131 F. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 3:40 am
It is settled law that that removal of children should usually be effected pursuant to an Emergency Protection Order (EPO), and that section 46 should only be used where it is not practicable to execute an EPO (Langley -v- Liverpool City Council). [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 2:36 pm
Phelan, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Representing D&L Langley Trucking: Scott E. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:13 am
But U.S. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:21 am
Such was the case in Langley v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:58 pm
More on the 2002 Supreme Court ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am
Significantly, there is no right of appeal to the Crown Court against a decision of the magistrates' to vary (or not to vary) an ASBO; one must either seek judicial review or appeal by way of case stated - Langley v Preston Crown Court [2008] EWHC 2623 (Admin). [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am
Significantly, there is no right of appeal to the Crown Court against a decision of the magistrates' to vary (or not to vary) an ASBO; one must either seek judicial review or appeal by way of case stated - Langley v Preston Crown Court [2008] EWHC 2623 (Admin). [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:07 am
The case of Wolf v Stadt Frankfurt Am Main heard before the European Court of Justice (ECJ) held that it was lawful for an upper age limit of 30 to be applied by the Federal state of Hesse in Germany on recruiting firemen. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:24 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia put it best speaking about Section 13(e) in Langley v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:24 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia put it best speaking about Section 13(e) in Langley v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:24 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia put it best speaking about Section 13(e) in Langley v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 1:14 am
Abbey National v Miller [2006] EWCA Civ 1520; [2007] EWCA Civ 138 Miller-Foulds v Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs [2008] EWHC 3443 (Ch); [2009] EWCA Civ 1132 You'd be forgiven for not having noticed any of this (long running) litigation over the last 3 years (if only because you need both Casetrack and Lawtel in order to find all four judgments, none of which seem to be on Bailii). [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
He died 3 days later of the injuries at the age of 47. * 1599: Nanda Bayin, a Burman king, reportedly laughed to death when informed, by a visiting Italian merchant, that “Venice was a free state without a king. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Guida, No. 05-6105 In death penalty habeas proceedings in a case in which petitioner effectuated a murder-for-hire against her husband, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) state courts reasonably applied Strickland by concluding that petitioner sabotaged her own defense, as counsel's performance is not deficient when counsel follows a client's instructions; 2) state courts reasonably applied Brady because even if certain letters were favorable evidence, and were… [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 6:59 am
Ashley Langley v (1) Preston Crown Court (2) West Lancashire DC (3) The Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWHC 2623 (Admin) concerns the routes of appeal from an order varying an ASBO. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
V. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
