Search for: "Lanham v. United States of America"
Results 61 - 80
of 156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2012, 9:16 am
United States Olympic Comm., 483 U. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 8:58 am
An interesting decision came down last week from the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, Doe vs. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 8:58 am
An interesting decision came down last week from the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, Doe vs. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 2:53 am
Bereskin, Q.C., Anti-Dilution, Anti-Free-Riding Laws in the United States, Canada, and the EU: Bridges Too Far?. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am
” Though the Lanham Act didn’t control here, Lanham Act precedent was “instructive” in construing the state laws here. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
E.g., United We Stand America, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
PARKER New York : Cambridge University Press, 2011 KF395 .P37 2011 See Catalog Communication in law -- United States TONGUE-TIED AMERICA / ROBERT N. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
PARKER New York : Cambridge University Press, 2011 KF395 .P37 2011 See Catalog Communication in law -- United States TONGUE-TIED AMERICA / ROBERT N. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:28 pm
In The Last Best Beef, LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 3:28 pm
” Omega sold the watches only for distribution in South America, but they found their way to the United States, where they were resold by Costco stores in California at a price of $1,299, compared to the $1,999 suggested retail price for authorized US resellers. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 11:30 am
United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:20 pm
Now, only the United States may sue for statutory damages.A new private suit provision (35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Importantly, the Court’s discussion of the source-identifying function of trademarks, repeated emphasis on source confusion as the principal harm in trademark law (see, e.g., the type of confusion “most commonly in trademark law’s sights”, “the bête noire of trademark law”, and the “cardinal sin under the law”), and discussion of the United We Stand America opinion suggests the Justices may like Rogers’ focus on preventing… [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 12:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 5:20 am
Kehoe Component Sales Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
March 2, 2023 | By: David Ludwig Last month, the Fourth Circuit issued a landmark intellectual property ruling in The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. [read post]
