Search for: "Law v. Aetna Life Insurance Company" Results 61 - 80 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2014, 6:38 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Aetna Life Insurance Company issued a "Non-Cancellable and Guaranteed Continuable Disability Income Policy" to Fernandez, effective on October 28, 1981. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:41 am by Marty Lederman
 In such cases, an employer purchases an employee insurance policy from an insurance company, or issuer, such as Aetna or Blue Cross/Blue Shield, and the issuer itself then bears the costs of reimbursing employees for their health care expenses. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:40 am by Amy Howe
:  implied preemption of state-claims by the federal food and drug law Aetna Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
{A case that illustrates the breadth of interest that corrodes due process is Aetna Life Ins. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 8:58 am by Joe Consumer
" Moreover, because the ads contained so many inaccuracies, two companies - Crum and Foster and Aetna - were forced to sign consent orders with state insurance commissioners in Connecticut and Kansas, agreeing to stop publishing these ads. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm by Marty Lederman
  According to a statement issued by a University Vice President, it appears that Notre Dame will certify that it objects to contraception coverage, which means that Notre Dame students will receive contraceptive coverage from an insurance company (Aetna) and Notre Dame employees will receive such coverage from Notre Dame's third-party administrator (Meritain Health, Inc.), which will be reimbursed by the federal government. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am by Marty Lederman
 Application of the accommodation in the case of “self-insured” plans, however, may raise slightly more complicated questions.Insured plansMost employers purchase their employees’ insurance coverage from an insurance company, or issuer, such as Aetna or Blue Cross/Blue Shield. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am by stevemehta
The appeal court invoked the collateral source rule, which says damages shouldn’t be reduced simply because the victim receives benefits from other sources, such as insurance companies. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:13 am
Levy, 247 P. 967 (Oklahoma Supreme Court 1026); Aetna Life Ins. [read post]